i dont think developers are the ones who will profit - after all, developers are the ones who wrote the code for a lot of financial institutions, and none of them gain much more than just a salary.
This (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_companies_by_r...) lists the 5 largest companies in the US as:
1. Walmart
2. Berkshire Hathaway
3. Apple
4. Exxon Mobil
5. McKesson
Walmart's CEO, Doug McMillon, career at Walmart was in distribution and then buying before moving to the executive.
Buffett had a background in business admin, economics and insurance.
Tim Cook has that CS background.
Daren Woods of Exxon Mobil has a degree in Electrical Engineering in the early 80s, which might be at best half a point.
John Hammergren of McKesson has a pure business background, with a Bachelors and Masters in Business Administration.
1. Apple 2. Alphabet 3. Microsoft 4. Amazon 5. Berkshire Hathaway
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_public_corporations_by...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_public_corporations_by...
1. Apple
2. Alphabet
3. Microsoft
4. Amazon
5. Berkshire Hathaway
Does he? He certainly has decades of experience in computer companies, but his educational background was, to my knowledge, in industrial engineering.
I don't think these VC-backed cryptocurrencies will win in the long term. It's the same principle as with stocks, cryptocurrencies are going to work in favour those who understand them the most; in this case, developers.
The mission of cryptocurrencies is to take control away from finance people. Hobbyist developers are going to decide which cryptocurrencies deserve their precious development time.
Cryptocurrencies are all about the tooling and infrastructure around them.