News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by idlewords on Thursday August 03, 2017 @12:37PM (#14921090)
While we're in this thread: notice that pączki is a plural. Please remember this and don't say 'pierogies'—it's just pierogi.

There's no need to know the singular for pierogi, because no one has ever eaten just one.

In return, I promise to continue working to stop Polish people from pluralizing potato chips as "chipsy".

Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by pavel_lishin on Thursday August 03, 2017 @01:05PM (#14921416)
But at a certain point, a loan word becomes "adopted" by its language, right? And at that point, it doesn't make sense to carry over the foreign rules for pluralization, etc.

I'm not sure if "pierogi" is common enough yet for "pierogies" to become the valid way to pluralize it in English, but as a Russian speaker, "чипсы" sounds perfectly normal to me.

After all, if I were speaking Russian I wouldn't say "компьютерз" - I would say "компьютеры", using the correct pluralization in the language I'm speaking in.

Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by jamie_ca on Thursday August 03, 2017 @05:01PM (#14923852)
Canadian, can confirm my family has been eating perogies for the past 30 years.
Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by idlewords on Thursday August 03, 2017 @01:16PM (#14921517)
I'm trying to get them to say "czypy". I have so many white whales.
Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by jagger11 on Thursday August 03, 2017 @03:44PM (#14923088)
> I'm trying to get them to say "czypy"

You can try to interest "Rada Języka Polskiego" (Polish Language Council) into this topic. Just because we all know, every Polish speaker will follow their advice diligently :).

In early 90's, after the COCOM embargo on import of computers into former then Eastern Block had been lifted, there were initiatives to translate English-sounding word into something more native to Polish language.

An example of a word that badly needed such translation was 'interface', for which a proposed translation was 'międzymordzie' (literally: a thing between two faces) which sounded hilariously bad in Polish. There was another proposal to name 'computer mouse' as something even better, but I've forgotten the name since.

Fortunately, nobody followed, and 'computer mouse' is simply 'mysz' (mouse). I hear, that French had longer lasting successes with their translations.

Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by ethelward on Thursday August 03, 2017 @07:43PM (#14925065)
> I hear, that French had longer lasting successes with their translations.

Kind of. Generally, ‶old″ words are consistently translated. For instance, we have souris for mouse (which is exactly the direct translation, because it conveys the same idea), ordinateur (which could be translated as ‶sorter/processor″) for computer, informatique (science of the information) for computer science, disquette (small disk) for floppy disk, logiciel for software, and so on.

However, newer ones (i.e. past ~1985) didn't catch so much, mostly because the official translation were awful and/or came years too late. For instance, CD-ROM is supposes to be cédérom, i.e. the straight phonetic transliteration – losing all meaning in the process; tablet is supposed to be ardoise numérique (digital slate) – evokes school, came years too late and was too long in comparison to the colloquial tablette; fouineur (snooper) for hacker (no comment...); cybermonnaie (cyber-money) for cryptocurrency – losing half of the semantic, and so on.

Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by gregyst on Thursday August 03, 2017 @05:08PM (#14923899)
I heard the mouse was supposed to be called "manipulator stołokulotoczny" (manipulator with a ball rolling on the table - due to the way old style mice were designed).
Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by joering2 on Thursday August 03, 2017 @04:52PM (#14923766)
The two Polish sentences every respectful Pole knows:

W Szczebrzeszynie chrząszcz brzmi w trzcinie.

And:

Stół z powyłamywanymi nogami.

I sure youtube will find you proper pronunciations.

Some called the mouse "gryzon" which means rodent, but that was very early days of computers in Poland - say 1990.

Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by int_19h on Thursday August 03, 2017 @07:30PM (#14924982)
"Rodent" is occasionally used to reference the mouse in English hacker slang, as well. Example:

http://www.nongnu.org/ratpoison/

Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by kwhitefoot on Friday August 04, 2017 @03:59PM (#14931668)
I often say rodent when I am trying to encourage my younger colleagues to use the command line.
Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by jwilk on Thursday August 03, 2017 @06:35PM (#14924594)
"gryzoń"
Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by peteretep on Thursday August 03, 2017 @12:44PM (#14921157)

    > I promise to continue working to stop
A general campaign to stop non-natively-Anglophone Europeans from using "funny" to mean "lots of fun" would also be appreicated.
Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by microcolonel on Thursday August 03, 2017 @03:07PM (#14922709)
Yikes, that could cause some heartbreak. Somebody says it was funny to work with you, with a big grin on his face.
Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by Sharlin on Thursday August 03, 2017 @05:57PM (#14924315)
> In return, I promise to continue working to stop Polish people from pluralizing potato chips as "chipsy".

Finns are great at this as well. Some examples:

  chips - sipsit

  shorts - shortsit

  donut, donuts - donitsi, donitsit

  ribs - ribsit (as in the food)

  wings - wingsit (likewise)
and so on. These are all basically established loans by now.

Then there's the recent abomination that seems to be getting popular as there's no established word for a mobile app yet:

  app, apps - äpsi, äpsit
Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by jonnycomputer on Thursday August 03, 2017 @04:28PM (#14923527)
> There's no need to know the singular for pierogi, because no one has ever eaten just one.

That, friend, is hilarious, and so true.

Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by FeatureRush on Thursday August 03, 2017 @04:48PM (#14923729)
'Pieróg' is also name of the shape, and some local dishes will be named after the shape, like 'Pieróg jeżycki' (small pizza folded in half).
Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by edgarvaldes on Thursday August 03, 2017 @07:09PM (#14924828)
Just like 'spaghetto'
Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by oz on Thursday August 03, 2017 @01:05PM (#14921413)
> There's no need to know the singular for pierogi, because no one has ever eaten just one.

Ain't that the truth! My Polish friend also introduced me to 'pierogi rooski'? Apparently, a Russian take on pierogi, with more meat. Do I have the spelling correct?

> In return, I promise to continue working to stop Polish people from pluralizing potato chips as "chipsy".

As a Jamaican, where banana chips are like a national snack, it was amusing to see "chipsy bananowe" for sale. Fun times; I plan to go back.

Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by dozzie on Thursday August 03, 2017 @05:06PM (#14923885)
> My Polish friend also introduced me to 'pierogi rooski'? Apparently, a Russian take on pierogi, with more meat.

If you mean "pierogi ruskie", they don't have any meat in them, just quark with potatoes and onion, though they're often served with bacon. And this dish comes from "Ruś" (now Ukraine), not "Rosja", otherwise it would be called "pierogi rosyjskie". I hear that in Ukraine they call this dish "Polish pierogi".

> As a Jamaican, [...], it was amusing to see "chipsy bananowe" for sale.

I believe "it" was not a Jamaican, however amusing it was.

Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by jwilk on Thursday August 03, 2017 @06:37PM (#14924603)
> "pierogi ruskie" [...], though they're often served with bacon

Blasphemy!

Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by bushin on Thursday August 03, 2017 @06:35PM (#14924595)
Stop messing with my mind, they are called 'vareniki'.
Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by idlewords on Thursday August 03, 2017 @01:17PM (#14921533)
No Russian take on anything has more meat.

In Poland, 'pierogi ruskie' are ones with cheese and potato. Also delicious!

Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by oz on Thursday August 03, 2017 @01:21PM (#14921577)
Ah, I must have been mistaken. Dziękuję!
Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by int_19h on Thursday August 03, 2017 @07:35PM (#14925018)
Adding to the other comments: the closest thing that can be described as "Russian take on pierogi" is pelmeni. In Ukrainian cuisine, it would be vareniki.

Confusingly, Russian does have the word "pirogi" (plural; singular "pirog") - but it's a kind of pie, not a dumpling.

Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by jonnycomputer on Thursday August 03, 2017 @04:29PM (#14923536)
most people don't wear pant.
Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by mootothemax on Thursday August 03, 2017 @01:25PM (#14921621)
I see your chipsy and raise you tipsy.

Not because there's anything wrong with it, that is.

It's just always puts a smile on my face when I walk past a tipsy nail salon with a sign that means euphemistically, to my British ears, being on the path to getting properly drunk.

Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by gbacon on Thursday August 03, 2017 @05:44PM (#14924178)
The old saw from too many bad Westerns of “I’ll see … and raise …” is an invalid string raise. Poker actions must be atomic.
Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by ggambetta on Thursday August 03, 2017 @03:12PM (#14922779)
Similar to Italian plurals - one "panino", many "panini", and "paninis" is not a thing.
Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by wink on Sunday August 06, 2017 @11:45AM (#14941748)
Germans love to order espressos. If they say espressi it always sounds pretentious. Sometimes it's espressis. Then everyone who speaks Italian winces (especially the Italians).

Then again, when I'm ordering an espresso in Italy, my results with just "caffé" are also mixed because it turns into the poison scene from The Princess Bride:

- is the guy speaking Italian? - is the guy just asking for a regular coffee because he doesn't speak Italian? - do they maybe call it different in different parts of the country?

I will never solve this mystery, I guess.

Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by owenversteeg on Thursday August 03, 2017 @02:07PM (#14922102)
Ok, so out of curiosity I googled "singular for pierogi", and it seems to be "pieróg". But there are a number of (seemingly) Polish people scattered around the Google results saying that this is never used, or incorrect, or refers to only the general form for filled dumplings.

Now I know that in real-world usage it would be unlikely to refer to one, but what if there was a need to? Let's say someone made a statue to pierogi, but due to budgetary problems only one of the several pierogi planned was constructed. A tourist asks you how many pierogi make up the statue. How would you respond? Would you use the singular, like "only one pieróg", or would you rework your response so there was no need for the singular, like "sadly only one of the several pierogi was built"? Which seems more natural?

Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by agsamek on Thursday August 03, 2017 @03:35PM (#14923007)
More common than Pieróg is Pierożek - formally a little Pieróg, but most people would use this one to single out Pierożek in a plate of Pierogi.
Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by idlewords on Thursday August 03, 2017 @02:17PM (#14922194)
Pieróg is correct.
Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by lkozma on Thursday August 03, 2017 @01:03PM (#14921401)
I recently came across some "burekasim" in Israel. The double plural there has a taste of the entire mediterranean from turkish/greek/arabic/ladino/spanish/hebrew :) I guess it could be dialed up one more notch if an english-speaking tourist would ask for some burekasims.
Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by idlewords on Thursday August 03, 2017 @02:18PM (#14922205)
Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by mjd on Thursday August 03, 2017 @12:45PM (#14921166)
Another Polish-speaker who read this article said she was delighted by my use of “ogoneks” instead of “ogoneki”.
Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by idlewords on Thursday August 03, 2017 @12:53PM (#14921262)
For Polish speakers, your post is like watching someone dive from a high platform onto a cactus. You have our attention!
Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by mjd on Thursday August 03, 2017 @01:15PM (#14921498)
By the way, I was on the big island of Hawai‘i last month and I drove past Pszyk Road. As well as I can discover, this was named for a Polish immigrant whose descendants now have names like Harmony Wai‘olohe Pszyk.
Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by idlewords on Thursday August 03, 2017 @01:19PM (#14921556)
This makes me extremely happy. I also think there should be exit visas based on last name. Let's not repeat the tragedy of this guy: http://www.thebaseballcube.com/players/profile.asp?P=Joe-Gwo...
Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by mootothemax on Thursday August 03, 2017 @01:21PM (#14921578)
My eldest daughter, a native Ponglish speaker, came out with Thankuję a few years back.

I've been dining off it since.

Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by magic_beans on Thursday August 03, 2017 @03:12PM (#14922774)
> Like watching someone dive from a high platform onto a cactus

This is a hilariously colorful analogy. Is it a translation of a Polish analogy, or are you just a very descriptive English speaker?

Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by morsch on Thursday August 03, 2017 @05:00PM (#14923840)
Maybe the former, definitely the latter; see http://idlewords.com/2007/04/the_alameda_weehawken_burrito_t... or any of the articles on his blog.
Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by idlewords on Thursday August 03, 2017 @06:33PM (#14924584)
I am just a descriptive English speaker. Thank you for the kind words!
Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by mjd on Thursday August 03, 2017 @12:56PM (#14921309)
Thank you sir! I thought of you while I was writing it, and hoped that I would not make you feel embarrassed on my behalf.
Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by idlewords on Thursday August 03, 2017 @01:00PM (#14921352)
It was an awesome post!
Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by waqf on Thursday August 03, 2017 @12:47PM (#14921182)
*"ogonki"
Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by mjd on Thursday August 03, 2017 @12:51PM (#14921240)
Right, thanks!
Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by schoen on Thursday August 03, 2017 @03:54PM (#14923170)
Ouch, that asterisk does some seriously confusing double-duty in a thread like this...

In Internet forum speak, the asterisk means "I meant to say" or "You meant to say".

In linguistics, the asterisk means "This form is not attested (we don't have examples of people using it)" or "This form would be considered mistaken by speakers".

That means that the forum usage of asterisks is something like "I should have said X" while the linguistics use of asterisks is something like "I shouldn't have said X". :-(

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asterisk#Linguistics

"In linguistics, an asterisk is placed before a word or phrase to indicate that it is not used, or there are no records of it being in use."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asterisk#Typography

"Asterisks may denote corrections to misspelling or misstatements in previous electronic messages"

Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by szatkus on Thursday August 03, 2017 @05:32PM (#14924095)
> In return, I promise to continue working to stop Polish people from pluralizing potato chips as "chipsy".

So, like "chipy"? I don't think it's a good idea :)

Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by ScottBurson on Thursday August 03, 2017 @06:27PM (#14924527)
You never know. I have an old friend from college who has, in his entire life, eaten exactly one potato chip.
Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by waqf on Thursday August 03, 2017 @12:39PM (#14921107)
Don't forget panini!
Re:Sabotaged by Polish orthography by mtrycz on Thursday August 03, 2017 @01:02PM (#14921384)
Oh yeah! Fresh Italian Paninis! They're the best Paninis!