News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Goldman Sachs relaxes dress code for techs in fight for t... by brandonmenc on Saturday July 15, 2017 @03:04PM (#14778324)
You can either chafe, or acknowledge reality and use it to your advantage.

When I was younger, I chafed. Now, I enjoy getting seated at that restaurant table before you.

Re:Goldman Sachs relaxes dress code for techs in fight for t... by Doctor_Fegg on Saturday July 15, 2017 @03:16PM (#14778389)
And the presence of a load of suits is a good indicator for the rest of us that it's not the sort of restaurant atmosphere we'll enjoy...
Re:Goldman Sachs relaxes dress code for techs in fight for t... by eertami on Saturday July 15, 2017 @08:37PM (#14779868)
Hahaha oh man it's hard to tell on the internet but I hope this is facetious and you genuinely don't think restaurants are going to ever move you ahead in the queue.
Re:Goldman Sachs relaxes dress code for techs in fight for t... by brandonmenc on Saturday July 15, 2017 @10:09PM (#14780136)
I'm kind of being facetious.

It's just an observation that the more professional you look, the better you'll be treated. Yes, that's a fact. Yes, it's probably a sad commentary. And I rarely wear dress clothes - but I know when to, and I don't complain.

Anecdotally, I have worked at restaurants where we wouldn't seat people who were wearing denim, no matter how expensive it was.

Re:Goldman Sachs relaxes dress code for techs in fight for t... by clentaminator on Saturday July 15, 2017 @03:42PM (#14778519)
When everyone is wearing a suit, how does one differentiate?
Re:Goldman Sachs relaxes dress code for techs in fight for t... by eropple on Saturday July 15, 2017 @03:45PM (#14778542)
Same way you differentiate between different stuff in the same class--quality, style, that sort of thing. I've never worried about that part of things, though, because the jump from "no suit" to "well-fitted suit" feels bigger to me than "well-fitted suit" to "well-fitted, expensive suit", and I mostly wear one because I like them, so I haven't indulged.
Re:Goldman Sachs relaxes dress code for techs in fight for t... by avar on Saturday July 15, 2017 @05:56PM (#14779216)
By comparing the quality of your respective business cards of course.
Re:Goldman Sachs relaxes dress code for techs in fight for t... by gaius on Saturday July 15, 2017 @04:13PM (#14778696)
Watch I guess, Patek trumps Rolex and so on...
Re:Goldman Sachs relaxes dress code for techs in fight for t... by giobox on Saturday July 15, 2017 @05:30PM (#14779075)
There's few things that make a worse first impression on me faster than someone wearing a watch as a status symbol.
Re:Goldman Sachs relaxes dress code for techs in fight for t... by gaius on Sunday July 16, 2017 @03:12AM (#14780926)
How would you know, unless you were making an effort yourself to check out their watch? And knew which watches were status symbols?
Re:Goldman Sachs relaxes dress code for techs in fight for t... by Mikeb85 on Saturday July 15, 2017 @08:12PM (#14779811)
Depends how expensive the watch is. If it's a $100K watch, you can be fairly sure they have money.
Re:Goldman Sachs relaxes dress code for techs in fight for t... by Mikeb85 on Saturday July 15, 2017 @08:11PM (#14779808)
Watches. Tag < Rolex < Audemars < Patek. Or shoes, or quality of suit, style, age, companion, car, etc...
Re:Goldman Sachs relaxes dress code for techs in fight for t... by mianos on Sunday July 16, 2017 @02:55AM (#14780879)
No one recognises the higher end. Sure people notice a Rolex, TAG or Breitling but, in 10 years I can not remember anyone commenting on my AP.
Re:Goldman Sachs relaxes dress code for techs in fight for t... by srtjstjsj on Saturday July 15, 2017 @08:06PM (#14779792)
jokes on you. i don't go to restaurants that cater to image over quality of food.
Re:Goldman Sachs relaxes dress code for techs in fight for t... by Chris2048 on Saturday July 15, 2017 @06:11PM (#14779294)
aka selling out.