Re:Goldman Sachs relaxes dress code for techs in fight for t...
by clentaminator on Saturday July 15, 2017 @03:42PM
(#14778519)
When everyone is wearing a suit, how does one differentiate?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Goldman Sachs relaxes dress code for techs in fight for t...
by eropple on Saturday July 15, 2017 @03:45PM
(#14778542)
Same way you differentiate between different stuff in the same class--quality, style, that sort of thing. I've never worried about that part of things, though, because the jump from "no suit" to "well-fitted suit" feels bigger to me than "well-fitted suit" to "well-fitted, expensive suit", and I mostly wear one because I like them, so I haven't indulged.
Re:Goldman Sachs relaxes dress code for techs in fight for t...
by avar on Saturday July 15, 2017 @05:56PM
(#14779216)
By comparing the quality of your respective business cards of course.
Re:Goldman Sachs relaxes dress code for techs in fight for t...
by gaius on Saturday July 15, 2017 @04:13PM
(#14778696)
Watch I guess, Patek trumps Rolex and so on...
Re:Goldman Sachs relaxes dress code for techs in fight for t...
by giobox on Saturday July 15, 2017 @05:30PM
(#14779075)
There's few things that make a worse first impression on me faster than someone wearing a watch as a status symbol.
Re:Goldman Sachs relaxes dress code for techs in fight for t...
by gaius on Sunday July 16, 2017 @03:12AM
(#14780926)
How would you know, unless you were making an effort yourself to check out their watch? And knew which watches were status symbols?
Re:Goldman Sachs relaxes dress code for techs in fight for t...
by Mikeb85 on Saturday July 15, 2017 @08:12PM
(#14779811)
Depends how expensive the watch is. If it's a $100K watch, you can be fairly sure they have money.