I'm incredibly conflicted, because I need a new portable computer, and I love the Surface, but I do not love Microsoft.
Alternatively, are there any other laptops like the Surface Book (i.e., have a detachable touch screen) that work with Linux?
TL;DR: You can install and run it, but touch, pen, and the dGPU do not work, which makes it kind of pointless compared to e.g. an XPS 13.
I actually like touch screens, but they do not work well in Linux. I didn't 'get' Windows 8 until I got my Surface, and I really enjoy using the touch screen when browsing the web and just screwing around with my computer. Touch/pen is a lot more convenient than any other mouse replacement while on the go.
I will be surprised if the Linux community does anything meaningful with touch in the next 5 years though.
As for WiFi, I hate how finicky it is, but it isn't really the developers fault. I spent an entire week trying to get a "Linux compatible" WiFi dongle working before I gave up and returned it. The drivers had been written for Linux 4.1 or maybe even 3.xx. Once I took care of all of the errors and got the driver to compile, I learned that the USB 3.0 version never worked on Linux, despite the fact that the manufacturer had compiled a driver.
At least every new install of Linux doesn't start from the command line, unless you are looking for a distro like that.
As for the WiFi, that's probably more Microsoft's fault. For some reason they insist on using these godawful Marvell chipsets for all the Surfaces. Users have been yelling at them to pick anything else, but it hasn't stuck.
As far as I'm aware, there are no WiFi dongles that support 802.11AC. I think your only option is internal. So if you want to connect to a 802.11ac network on a Linux desktop your only option is connecting through a wired connection with a bridged 802.11ac router or something.
I don't personally mind, but I do think it's bad for the adoption of Linux. Most people I know only have Laptops, and if people can't get their WiFi working they aren't going to use Linux.
Does this library not work with newer chipsets?
- check my emails;
- manage my todo lists (previously with Wunderlist, now with Microsoft To-Do);
- watch Twitch with Livebeard or Unstream;
- watch YouTube with TubeCast (could use a better app for this, but I haven't looked in a long time);
- rent and watch movies from the Store app;
- read and manage my notes with OneNote;
- listen to music with Groove;
- use Twitter with Aeries or Tweetium;
- read my Pocket articles with Latermark;
- listen to podcasts with Grover Pro;
I make liberal use of the window snapping feature to do most of those things side-by-side with my browser open.
When in tablet mode I'm primary consuming content, and I've found that my Windows device is just as good at that as an iPad or Android tablet. If I'm in tablet mode I'm sticking to the apps that were built for touch, i.e. apps from the store and Edge, not poking around in VSCode or other apps meant for a mouse or keyboard.
What really sold it for me was that I can just flip it over into full laptop mode whenever I want and have 16gb, core i7 dev laptop ready to go instantly.
For reading PDFs, I'd recommend taking a look at Edge again. It's pretty great for reading PDFs and ebooks with the new Creator's Update.
Already does fluent design (acrylic) and is very actively supported. Just days ago it added 360 support for example which I think no other app does. It's really good.
First you respond saying that the problem with the Surface is it's not touch-friendly, then when pointed out that it apparently is you reply saying that if it's used in touch mode then its power is irrelevant, and you seem to be missing the point that being able to operate as a powerful machine OR a touch-friendly machine, with the user being able to choose between them, is a double win, not a double loss.
Basically, your comments on this subject come across as biased in favour of iPad over Surface. And I say that as somebody who has never owned a Surface and who hasn't owned an iPad for several years.