News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google's controversial groundwater withdrawal sparks ques... by revelation on Saturday April 22, 2017 @03:44PM (#14174353)
Water is great for cooling, but who the hell dumps it afterwards?! I don't think they quite understood what "water cooling" is..
Re:Google's controversial groundwater withdrawal sparks ques... by ryandvm on Saturday April 22, 2017 @04:25PM (#14174553)
They dump it because it's not cool anymore and nobody is wanting to buy hot water from them at a cost that makes it worth their while.

If they had the capability to cool the water fast enough then they'd use a closed loop cooling system and wouldn't need to pump fresh, cool groundwater.

Re:Google's controversial groundwater withdrawal sparks ques... by revelation on Saturday April 22, 2017 @04:39PM (#14174633)
Well, duh. If I had to pay nothing for water, I would also just run the tap through a radiator all day and save on the AC electricity.

But then I also have a conscience and realize what a gigantic waste that is, so I don't.

Re:Google's controversial groundwater withdrawal sparks ques... by d-sc on Saturday April 22, 2017 @06:08PM (#14175102)
This is basically how we cool our house in Montana during the summers. Cold water is pumped up one well and hot water is returned down another well. It uses much less electricity than a conventional AC system.
Re:Google's controversial groundwater withdrawal sparks ques... by lucb1e on Saturday April 22, 2017 @06:34PM (#14175240)
Wow. I've thought about this, using tap water to cool the house, but it's so wasteful it was never more than a playful thought. But then the Netherlands' summers are reasonably survivable even if they make me feel shit all day and all night.
Re:Google's controversial groundwater withdrawal sparks ques... by d-sc on Saturday April 22, 2017 @07:59PM (#14175612)
At the end of the day, net zero water is 'used' it is all returned to the ground.

Its actually a strong net water savings: the production of electricity in Montana uses around 16 gallons of water per kilowatt hour.

Re:Google's controversial groundwater withdrawal sparks ques... by dogma1138 on Saturday April 22, 2017 @04:31PM (#14174588)
Large scale water cooling systems are open return systems.

Basically they pump in cold water and pump hot water back out.

Cooling the water is expensive and ineffective on large scales.

Beyond that you have evaporative cooling which is used for large scale HVAC systems in this case the water simply evaporates away into the atmosphere.

Re:Google's controversial groundwater withdrawal sparks ques... by m-j-fox on Saturday April 22, 2017 @10:00PM (#14176013)
Fine but why not pump it out onto some crops? Here I am paying to heat water for my house and pool -- I should move next door to Google and hook up to their drain pipe.
Re:Google's controversial groundwater withdrawal sparks ques... by dogma1138 on Sunday April 23, 2017 @11:15AM (#14178472)
You can try some places use reclaimed hot water from industrials sources for metropolitan heating.
Re:Google's controversial groundwater withdrawal sparks ques... by mirimir on Saturday April 22, 2017 @03:55PM (#14174409)
Yes, I don't get it either. The article implies that they reuse it for a while, and then dump. But I can imagine how filter and ion-exchange systems need water for back-flushing and other maintenance. So maybe there's some hard-to-avoid loss.
Re:Google's controversial groundwater withdrawal sparks ques... by jankey on Sunday April 23, 2017 @07:13AM (#14177651)
It's not being dumped, it evaporates.

Check https://www.google.com/about/datacenters/inside/locations/be... and https://www.google.com/about/datacenters/efficiency/internal... .

(Disclaimer: I work in (another) Google datacentre)

Re:Google's controversial groundwater withdrawal sparks ques... by wollstonecraft on Saturday April 22, 2017 @04:29PM (#14174572)
Evaporative cooling, like those cooling towers next to hydrothermal power plants.