News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Stories that Hacker News removes from the front page by dang on Monday March 13, 2017 @12:31PM (#13859329)
You're right, and I wrote that in haste, so I've taken out "It should really be lower than that because the article is completely wrong" and replaced it with "It should probably be lower".

Edit: I took a look at your list and don't see any pattern in those stories. Some belong on HN and indeed got a lot of time on the front page. Others clearly don't belong on HN. In a few cases moderators intervened to penalize the story or turn penalties off, but in a solid majority moderators didn't intervene at all. In a few cases a bunch of points were dropped by the anti-voting ring software so the 'real' score wasn't as high as it seemed.

To me all this shows, and the reason I described it as 'completely wrong', is that you can't reconstruct what's going on from timestamps, point totals, and story rank. There's simply too much data that isn't public. I know that's frustrating to the large section of HN's userbase who love to know what's going on and figure things out. But I don't believe making it all public would be helpful, so here's the balance we've arrived at over the years: we make public the the principles of how the system works, including moderator intervention, and we answer specific questions about specific cases.

Re:Stories that Hacker News removes from the front page by mlmlmasd on Monday March 13, 2017 @01:32PM (#13860139)
> There's simply too much data that isn't public.

Make it public?

Re:Stories that Hacker News removes from the front page by jandrese on Monday March 13, 2017 @02:14PM (#13860670)
The danger of making it public is that it makes the system much easier to game.

The upside is that it is easier to see who is gaming the system. Or that could be another downside if the answer is "the moderators".

Re:Stories that Hacker News removes from the front page by mlmlmasd on Monday March 13, 2017 @02:18PM (#13860718)
How does it make the system easier to game?

> Or that could be another downside if the answer is "the moderators".

To me it seems like an upside if we know when moderators are gaming the system.

Re:Stories that Hacker News removes from the front page by jandrese on Monday March 13, 2017 @09:55PM (#13864346)
I was being a little cheeky there implying that the moderators don't want the users to know if they're manipulating the votes.
Re:Stories that Hacker News removes from the front page by late2part on Monday March 13, 2017 @02:39PM (#13860927)
Security through obscurity is rarely a winning tactic.
Re:Stories that Hacker News removes from the front page by pvg on Monday March 13, 2017 @03:37PM (#13861535)
This may be true for locks and cryptography but a message board is not really a 'security system' nor does it fail completely and catastrophically if someone manages to figure out the details of the ranking algorithm or spam countermeasures.
Re:Stories that Hacker News removes from the front page by dang on Monday March 13, 2017 @03:37PM (#13861537)
That's only true when it's known how to publicly secure something.
Re:Stories that Hacker News removes from the front page by simplify on Monday March 13, 2017 @03:11PM (#13861262)
All security is some form of obscurity, is it not?
Re:Stories that Hacker News removes from the front page by pvg on Monday March 13, 2017 @03:35PM (#13861511)
No. That's not what the phrase means.
Re:Stories that Hacker News removes from the front page by mlmlmasd on Monday March 13, 2017 @03:22PM (#13861394)
I can't really think of any good forms of 'security through obscurity'. Is the elimination of buffer overflow vulns and sql injections a form of obscurity? Is SSL a form of obscurity?
Re:Stories that Hacker News removes from the front page by simplify on Monday March 13, 2017 @09:41PM (#13864280)
SSL is based on obscure prime numbers. Another example is user passwords (obscure text). Sessions and API tokens, too. Credit card numbers, garage door openers, and SIM cards all rely on hidden information. Even door locks are a physical form of hidden keys.

But you're right, there are some forms of security that don't require obscurity. For voting systems though, I would categorize them as "cat and mouse" systems, which unfortunately fall into the obscurity category.

Re:Stories that Hacker News removes from the front page by danmaz74 on Monday March 13, 2017 @04:41PM (#13862133)
That makes gaming the system too easy.
Re:Stories that Hacker News removes from the front page by dibeoenjr on Monday March 13, 2017 @01:20PM (#13859975)
Honestly this is typical of your usual responses to be dismissive, faux outraged... And also just incorrect, factually incorrect.

Someone finally has enough data to confront your obvious bias and enough people saw it that you had to back up and apologize but this is a rare exception.

Mods removed submissions and individual posts they find distasteful and it has nothing to do with HN guidelines, they are applied unequally just as some members get special treatment. hN is just not that honest of a place to have an open discussion on a variety of topics.

Re:Stories that Hacker News removes from the front page by somnialunatica on Monday March 13, 2017 @02:29PM (#13860835)
just a comment, then back to lurking:

no administration leads to 4chan like boards and newsfeeds

Re:Stories that Hacker News removes from the front page by cryptarch on Tuesday March 14, 2017 @09:18AM (#13867237)
4chan has administration, moderation and rules. I think most chans are pretty well-moderated.

/b/ is the best known and least moderated board of 4chan; only child pornography and brony stuff is removed.