News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Stories that Hacker News removes from the front page by late2part on Monday March 13, 2017 @02:39PM (#13860927)
Security through obscurity is rarely a winning tactic.
Re:Stories that Hacker News removes from the front page by pvg on Monday March 13, 2017 @03:37PM (#13861535)
This may be true for locks and cryptography but a message board is not really a 'security system' nor does it fail completely and catastrophically if someone manages to figure out the details of the ranking algorithm or spam countermeasures.
Re:Stories that Hacker News removes from the front page by dang on Monday March 13, 2017 @03:37PM (#13861537)
That's only true when it's known how to publicly secure something.
Re:Stories that Hacker News removes from the front page by simplify on Monday March 13, 2017 @03:11PM (#13861262)
All security is some form of obscurity, is it not?
Re:Stories that Hacker News removes from the front page by pvg on Monday March 13, 2017 @03:35PM (#13861511)
No. That's not what the phrase means.
Re:Stories that Hacker News removes from the front page by mlmlmasd on Monday March 13, 2017 @03:22PM (#13861394)
I can't really think of any good forms of 'security through obscurity'. Is the elimination of buffer overflow vulns and sql injections a form of obscurity? Is SSL a form of obscurity?
Re:Stories that Hacker News removes from the front page by simplify on Monday March 13, 2017 @09:41PM (#13864280)
SSL is based on obscure prime numbers. Another example is user passwords (obscure text). Sessions and API tokens, too. Credit card numbers, garage door openers, and SIM cards all rely on hidden information. Even door locks are a physical form of hidden keys.

But you're right, there are some forms of security that don't require obscurity. For voting systems though, I would categorize them as "cat and mouse" systems, which unfortunately fall into the obscurity category.