News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Atom 1.13 by nkkollaw on Tuesday January 10, 2017 @06:21PM (#13370222)
I love Atom, and use it as my main editor, but it's many times slower than Sublime Text.

I hope but doubt Electron will ever get near native in terms of performance.

Re:Atom 1.13 by sb8244 on Tuesday January 10, 2017 @06:33PM (#13370309)
I'm curious if you have tried VSCode? It seems significantly faster than Atom and is built on Electron (and I think an Atom base).
Re:Atom 1.13 by xiaoma on Tuesday January 10, 2017 @11:35PM (#13371781)
Microsoft has an extraordinary amount of in-house talent when it comes to IDEs and performance, and it shows in VSCode.

The difference in responsiveness between the two editors is stark and it's a primary reason I never use Atom anymore (though the increasingly sophisticated intellisense and integrated CLI tools is what's kept me in VSCode).

Re:Atom 1.13 by pvinis on Wednesday January 11, 2017 @01:35AM (#13372191)
Omg these three comments are the same in every atom release. It's not a bad thing, just funny. 1. Atom is slow. 2. Have you tried VS Code? 3. Microsoft has a small but effective team developing VS Code, well done to them.
Re:Atom 1.13 by StyloBill on Wednesday January 11, 2017 @03:15PM (#13377133)
Every frigging time. This pattern never ceases to amaze me.
Re:Atom 1.13 by harrygeez on Wednesday January 11, 2017 @09:25AM (#13374023)
Idk but I remember reading somewhere that VSCode is written by a 5 man team?
Re:Atom 1.13 by nkkollaw on Monday January 16, 2017 @10:23AM (#13410431)
Isn't Sublime Text one guy..?
Re:Atom 1.13 by nkkollaw on Wednesday January 11, 2017 @04:26AM (#13372772)
I have.

There are a few things I like about Atom that keep me from switching despite its speed.

I just wish it was native, or at least a little faster. It's got bugs, too.

Re:Atom 1.13 by sakabaro on Tuesday January 10, 2017 @06:26PM (#13370263)
Yeah, even the 2x claimed is nothing compared to sublime.
Re:Atom 1.13 by akmittal on Wednesday January 11, 2017 @11:15AM (#13374947)
Webassembly and Servo might big boost when available.
Re:Atom 1.13 by hccampos on Tuesday January 10, 2017 @04:47PM (#13369420)
I wonder how noticeable the recent performance improvements really are.

I have been on VSCode for a while but might give Atom a try for a change, and see how much it has evolved.

Re:Atom 1.13 by sklegg on Tuesday January 10, 2017 @05:17PM (#13369703)
Stick with VSCode. It's better in my experience.
Re:Atom 1.13 by ZenoArrow on Tuesday January 10, 2017 @06:37PM (#13370342)
I prefer VSC too, but no harm in trying out the improvements in Atom.

There's one feature/plugin in Atom that I wish VSC had, which is browser-plus. I haven't found anything comparable in VSC, which is a shame as it'd be useful when iterating through website designs.

Re:Atom 1.13 by erolrfn on Wednesday January 11, 2017 @03:01AM (#13372478)
Large File Performance graph suggests that it will open a 7MB file in 300ms~350ms yet it still opens a 7MB utf-8 encoded file in 6000ms.
Re:Atom 1.13 by maxbrunsfeld on Wednesday January 11, 2017 @12:39PM (#13375724)
Is this on 1.14-beta0? If so, please open an issue. We now do a lot of text layout computation lazily, but currently, it's very easy for a third-party package to accidentally force the entire text layout to be computed immediately via an API call.
Re:Atom 1.13 by jgalt212 on Wednesday January 11, 2017 @06:56AM (#13373306)
Yes, Atom isn't the greatest across a number of performance metrics, but if my experience it irresplacable for:

1. markdown support is top notch

2. proto-repl[1] in clojure is amazing and only available on Atom.

[1] https://atom.io/packages/proto-repl

Re:Atom 1.13 by grigio on Tuesday January 10, 2017 @06:43PM (#13370380)
is it faster than VSCode now?
Re:Atom 1.13 by pitaj on Tuesday January 10, 2017 @07:55PM (#13370833)
Unlikely, especially with plugins.
Re:Atom 1.13 by antigirl on Wednesday January 11, 2017 @05:20AM (#13372951)
VSCode all the way