News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Amazon Restaurants by Finnucane on Thursday December 15, 2016 @04:42PM (#13188726)
Does that mean your food delivery depends on the package delivery schedule? "Sorry your pizza is cold but we had to deliver a TV first."

For myself, I usually prefer to just go and pick up myself; that's almost always the fastest option.

Re:Amazon Restaurants by dmurray on Thursday December 15, 2016 @04:50PM (#13188793)
I think Amazon will figure out that hot food needs to be delivered fast and will generally get prioritised over delivering a TV.

> For myself, I usually prefer to just go and pick up myself; that's almost always the fastest option.

Most people don't care about getting the absolute fastest option, or if they do, they will still compromise for convenience.

Re:Amazon Restaurants by Finnucane on Thursday December 15, 2016 @05:00PM (#13188878)
I guess I don't have that much faith in Amazon's ability to prioritize the customer over themselves (i.e., prioritize routing for the least amount of driving, regardless of what is being delivered).
Re:Amazon Restaurants by softawre on Thursday December 15, 2016 @06:05PM (#13189526)
Really? To me, Amazon is one of the most customer-centric companies out there today.
Re:Amazon Restaurants by mulmen on Thursday December 15, 2016 @06:22PM (#13189650)
That's literally the mission statement of the company.
Re:Amazon Restaurants by ziszis on Thursday December 15, 2016 @10:35PM (#13190858)
Overall mission statements have low correlation with behavior. Enron's motto was "Respect, Integrity, Communication and Excellence."
Re:Amazon Restaurants by AndrewUnmuted on Friday December 16, 2016 @02:56AM (#13191783)
No, it's different at Amazon. I worked for Amazon for five years and not a day went by without me overhearing "how does this help our customers?" I've never seen anything like Amazon's company culture since, it's truly dogmatically geared towards customer experience.
Re:Amazon Restaurants by kosei on Friday December 16, 2016 @12:28AM (#13191281)
Agreed. The company is much more likely to do what's best for the company at the expense of the delivery people or the restaurants, based on their track record.[1]

[1] https://www.thestreet.com/story/13248764/1/amazons-got-its-s...

Re:Amazon Restaurants by chrisseaton on Thursday December 15, 2016 @06:19PM (#13189628)
But making sure the customer is satisfied, with hot food, is in Amazon's interest otherwise the customer won't order again or will ask for their money back.

In your mind if Amazon was optimising for their convenience alone they'd just pocket your money and not bother to ever deliver anything? Because that would the most convenient option for them.

Re:Amazon Restaurants by madgar on Thursday December 15, 2016 @11:17PM (#13191028)
> In your mind if Amazon was optimising for their convenience alone they'd just pocket your money and not bother to ever deliver anything?

That's called fraud and isn't generally considered a business model so much as a criminal enterprise

Re:Amazon Restaurants by coldtea on Friday December 16, 2016 @03:11AM (#13191820)
Delivering cold pizzas because you prioritized a product delivery is not a business model either, and yet we are discussing it seriously as if that's what Amazon will do.
Re:Amazon Restaurants by mulmen on Thursday December 15, 2016 @06:18PM (#13189626)
Have you ever done business with Amazon? You do realize the food delivery isn't being done from a warehouse with pizzas on the shelf right?

Your assumption runs contrary to the core idea of Amazon. Customer experience is the absolute most important thing.

Re:Amazon Restaurants by paulcole on Thursday December 15, 2016 @08:37PM (#13190387)
>Amazon's ability to prioritize the customer over themselves

Can you give some examples of times when Amazon HASN'T put the desires of the vast majority of customers first?

Re:Amazon Restaurants by ziszis on Thursday December 15, 2016 @10:30PM (#13190838)
There are many examples. Here is an obvious one - when Amazon stopped selling Apple TVs to punish Apple. Hard to see how this is good for consumers.

http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2015/10/01/amazon_blocks...

Re:Amazon Restaurants by DavidAdams on Thursday December 15, 2016 @11:55PM (#13191177)
If it convinced any Amazon customers to buy a Roku instead of an AppleTV, then it was most definitely good for the customer [rimshot].
Re:Amazon Restaurants by paulcole on Friday December 16, 2016 @03:03PM (#13196273)
A counter-argument is that fewer options helps consumers actually choose something that's good enough rather than debating and hand-wringing over their choice. Costco is pretty good at this.
Re:Amazon Restaurants by byoung2 on Thursday December 15, 2016 @06:19PM (#13189629)
For myself, I usually prefer to just go and pick up myself; that's almost always the fastest option.

For people with small kids, driving to pick up food can be a huge production, with car seats, diaper bags, strollers, etc. Curbside pickup helps, but delivery is so much easier, and sometimes just as fast.

Re:Amazon Restaurants by monk_e_boy on Thursday December 15, 2016 @06:30PM (#13189706)
Yeah, click for a delivery, bath the kids, read to them, put them to bed. Crack open some beer and wait for the food.

When I cook it usually takes an hour or so. So getting food delivered frees up that hour.

Re:Amazon Restaurants by blowski on Thursday December 15, 2016 @06:40PM (#13189790)
Agreed. There's also people who can't just "drive to the takeaway and back" because they don't have a car, are over the alcohol limit, etc.
Re:Amazon Restaurants by Dan_Nguyen on Thursday December 15, 2016 @05:40PM (#13189307)
In my house, we make good use of delivery for one major reason: sports.

Sometimes theres no dinner ready and in the hecticness of life, we forget to cook the night before so we get into an unfortunate situation of either going hungry until the game ends or cooking and miss the game.

Delivery solves this issue. Take out is definitely faster, but that usually means missing part of whatever game is on. My case obviously isn't universal but given the popularity of sports and how primetime games are only an hour or so after you get home from work, Id think there's a non negligible amount of people with similar situations.

Re:Amazon Restaurants by pbhjpbhj on Thursday December 15, 2016 @06:07PM (#13189541)
Or get a DVR and pause the TV whilst you get some food.
Re:Amazon Restaurants by nitrogen on Thursday December 15, 2016 @06:36PM (#13189751)
Some people might not like this since you'll be several minutes behind "live", but an advantage is you can skip any ads and commentary you don't like and catch up to live to see the final play at the same time as everyone else. I don't know if any PVRs still allow watching "live" at 1.25x or 1.5x speed, but if they do (like MythTV did/does) you can also condense a show into the time you have available and still watch the ending live.
Re:Amazon Restaurants by Finnucane on Thursday December 15, 2016 @06:13PM (#13189585)
I care about food more than sports. Which is easy, since I don't care about sports.
Re:Amazon Restaurants by ncallaway on Thursday December 15, 2016 @08:07PM (#13190256)
But, interestingly, there are other people in the world that feel differently than you.
Re:Amazon Restaurants by coldtea on Friday December 16, 2016 @03:13AM (#13191831)
Increasingly less, considering millenial attitudes towards ESPN and the like compared to previous generations at their age.
Re:Amazon Restaurants by brianpan on Thursday December 15, 2016 @05:18PM (#13189077)
This is under the PrimeNow banner- everything is delivered under an hour.
Re:Amazon Restaurants by dx034 on Friday December 16, 2016 @10:46AM (#13194003)
Depends on the area. At least in London, PrimeNow delivers under one hour for only parts of the city, the rest is in under 2 hours.
Re:Amazon Restaurants by coldtea on Friday December 16, 2016 @03:09AM (#13191815)
>For myself, I usually prefer to just go and pick up myself; that's almost always the fastest option.

It's not about being the fastest, though, it's about being more convenient.

And even fastest depends on the area. Where I live (near a city centre) I can chose among 300 restaurants from a centralized meta-ordering service, and have their food delivered in 20-40 minutes.

It will take me 20 minutes to even decide to get up, find my keys, drive around, order and wait for the food.

Re:Amazon Restaurants by maruhan2 on Thursday December 15, 2016 @08:23PM (#13190328)
I think it'd be more like alerts being sent to all the drivers asking who is available for pickup.
Re:Amazon Restaurants by MichaelBurge on Thursday December 15, 2016 @04:45PM (#13188751)
They should probably prioritize the food, and fill off-time with package deliveries.
Re:Amazon Restaurants by pmoriarty on Thursday December 15, 2016 @06:28PM (#13189693)
I've been really sick recently. So sick I couldn't go out of the house. Delivery was literally a life saver for me.