maruhan2

In theory it shouldn't, but in practice people don't make perfect code that doesn't have vulnerabilities. But a lot of people would argue that by having many reviewers, you're reducing vulnerabilities. Thus, my stance is that "it depends on the situation"

"hard work, delayed gratification, research, skepticism"

I feel like the best way to learn that is try it out yourself, which is what such magazines are encouraging no?

There are various reasons that people may ask to be exempt. Two that most comes to mind are:

1. Explicit or roundabout pressure from the managers

2. Being expected to produce the same outcome despite reduced work time

Both of which seems like a inertia issue with the culture not following the change. That would probably stabilize over time if a actual rule sets in place.

"It will protect against both malicious activities and accidents (e.g. an employee’s child accidentally wiping a mailbox)."

Can someone help me understand how a child accidentally wiping a mailbox is related to encryption? Isn't this just a matter of putting a password on your computer and not related to encryption?

just want to comment how there's so much in such a short time period. jesus you did not waste any time...

Worse than Minority Report because at least in there they were actually seeing the future not predicting it.

which is pretty ineffective since mosquitos are quite good at finding the body part that's uncovered. If you sleep like a cocoon and don't move i guess that works.

Very true. As a Korean, it really annoyed me that there were products that Korea or Japan had the first foot out on but could not go globally because it's not based on USA.

Although nowadays I don't think that's so much the case. Currently, I think America has more ideas coming out because it really is more innovative

Hey I'm curious about your journey than the final result. I only skimmed through the code, so I don't understand everything, but it seems that the list of things it will identify is in the "yaml" files. Did you write out all of them or was there a pre-existing database somewhere?

Ironically though, equipment that is supposed to last a long time and hasn't progressed that much over the years are lasting shorter. Examples are cars, microwaves, fridges, washing machines, etc. Recent cars for example on average malfunction quicker than ones 20 years ago.

So in that sense, technology that does not progress fast does not necessarily improve reliability

I agree. It's no brainer that repetition helps retention. If you gave your mind a time to think about what you learned, obviously you would retain it more.

Depends on how much protein she's consuming. If she consumes too much protein, she'll no longer be on ketogenesis. It doesn't say in the article how much fat she's consuming vs protein, but judging by her saying she's mainly eating meat, I don't think she's on ketogensis.

Age 27 here. I see more people moving away from snap and using instagram stories.

In that case, there would be a generally expected hours. You would still have to allocate expected finish time based on how many hours you are expecting to work per day.

Similar experience here. For me, the changing point was meeting a coworker who wanted to study and work on personal projects with me. So, one suggestion I can make is trying to work in various companies and find a buddy that can help u find your interest.

I think that's well known. I'm asking the "official hours"

May I ask what the typical programmer's salary is there?

curious as well. I first understood it as "how could they struggle with something so basic"

Demo account is cool and all but it still doesn't explain why the details are blurred out from the "screenshot"

I was actually interested in Sourcetrail, but the biggest drawback for me was not being able to use it without GUI. Is there any way to get an option to work with the dependency tree from the commandline?

Korean websites have similar aspects. However, Korean websites are slowly changing to be simpler and more visually appealing. Having experienced from Korea, I would extrapolate that Japanese (or Korean) websites are cluttered not because they believe it is better than non-clutter. It's cluttered because most people there don't have expertise in designing a simple and appealing website. In addition, Asian countries tend to be more focused on following the design of their rivals, and since early design is obviously more focused on information than beauty, people follow that. However, if you give a finished product where one is cluttered with information and the other is simple and visually appealing, I highly doubt that people will prefer the clutter.

if "deepfake" gets common, it could probably be similar to people's facebook account getting hacked and mass-messaging porn. Nowadays you just say "oops i've been hacked" and move on even if such message was sent to your boss. Same probably can happen

Except there are html, css, javascript. Everyone already uses a browser so nothing to set up. Just code and open it in your browser.

Most students studying abroad plan to work in that country

From my experience, intelligence matters less than diligence. And contrary to popular belief, I think high diligence is also genetic talent. Having said that, I don't think my intelligence is all that useful considering I have low diligence.

The argument of NN being a preemptive regulation on hypothetical future problems and thus could lead to unintentionally hurting "good" entities got me thinking why there can't be a new regulation scheme.

I'd call it "conditional enactment".

Basically, let us assume we want to regulate A because of a, b, and c reasons. We'll create a "conditional enactment" where it states the regulation proposal with reasons for regulating and the penalty for not abiding by the regulation. This basically acts as a save point where if some entity eventually does do A and qualifies one of those a,b,and c reasons, we'll continue on from that "save point". Now that we'll have more info, we can talk about what the pros and cons of regulating A are, adjust the regulation terms, adjust the punishment, and vote on the revised proposal. If the regulation passes, that entity is now subject to punishment even if the regulation passed after the entity's action was done. Any other entities that did A before the regulation passed is not subject to punishment.

This would potentially prevent the unintended side effects of the regulation and allow us to evaluate the state of the regulation while still putting the entities that could create harm in check.