News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The OPM Data Breach [pdf] by loteck on Thursday September 08, 2016 @07:36PM (#12458432)
"Additionally, fingerprint data of 5.6 million of these individuals was stolen."

They'll need to change their fingerprints immediately!

Re:The OPM Data Breach [pdf] by streptomycin on Thursday September 08, 2016 @10:08PM (#12459206)
The letter they sent me claimed that there is currently no way to create fake fingerprints, so there's nothing to be worried about, 2 years of identity theft monitoring is good enough.
Re:The OPM Data Breach [pdf] by biafra on Friday September 09, 2016 @02:02AM (#12459921)
In what world are they living, where there is "no way to create fake fingerprints"? Of course that is possible. Here is one example: http://dasalte.ccc.de/biometrie/fingerabdruck_kopieren.en

It is easily possible to create fake fingerprints that can fool any known finger print scanner. If you know one, that supposedly can't be tricked, please let me know.

Re:The OPM Data Breach [pdf] by jandrese on Friday September 09, 2016 @11:44AM (#12463251)
I wasn't sure if they were lying or merely incompetent when they said that. Mythbusters has an episode of them defeating fingerprint locks using a print lifted from a glass, and the technique they used was anything but sophisticated.
Re:The OPM Data Breach [pdf] by loteck on Thursday September 08, 2016 @11:04PM (#12459400)
I'm sure you're very comforted by that addition of the qualifier "currently."

Correlated letter from 2011: "Dear streptomycin, your fingerprint data is currently not stolen!"

Re:The OPM Data Breach [pdf] by mtgx on Friday September 09, 2016 @07:02AM (#12461019)
They lied to you. But what else is new.
Re:The OPM Data Breach [pdf] by UlyssesSKrunk on Friday September 09, 2016 @11:40AM (#12463217)
That was a blatant lie tho.
Re:The OPM Data Breach [pdf] by bigiain on Thursday September 08, 2016 @09:49PM (#12459136)
In keeping with industry best practice, I require staff to sandpaper off their fingerprints and regrow them every 90 days.

For "security".

Re:The OPM Data Breach [pdf] by redwards510 on Thursday September 08, 2016 @10:42PM (#12459330)
A bit extreme isn't that? I just have my staff paint their fingerprints with women's ruby red fingernail paint. It dries to a smooth glass-like finish.

For "security"

Re:The OPM Data Breach [pdf] by maerF0x0 on Thursday September 08, 2016 @09:04PM (#12458949)
Thats why fingerprint is username, not password
Re:The OPM Data Breach [pdf] by idlewords on Thursday September 08, 2016 @09:29PM (#12459050)
Password is thumbprint.
Re:The OPM Data Breach [pdf] by dredmorbius on Thursday September 08, 2016 @09:03PM (#12458944)
I'd like to see YYYY-04-01 RFC on biometrics authenticator expiration protocols.
Re:The OPM Data Breach [pdf] by bigiain on Thursday September 08, 2016 @09:51PM (#12459151)
"As an alternative, users may keep all their fingers in a fingerprint safe and secure them all with a single retina scan, which they can use to open the safe each time they need to use a finger."