Re:TSA's Head of Security 'Removed' from Office
by jimcsharp on Tuesday May 24, 2016 @07:41AM
(#11760698)
Maybe this is the movies I've watched, but isn't firing a gun structurally dangerous to the airplane?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:TSA's Head of Security 'Removed' from Office
by headShrinker on Tuesday May 24, 2016 @08:40AM
(#11761046)
Not to get too chatty but, myth busters had an episode on plane cabin decompression. The gun didn't have much effect. Granted, the plane wasn't moving
Edit: better link
Re:TSA's Head of Security 'Removed' from Office
by deelowe on Tuesday May 24, 2016 @07:48AM
(#11760730)
Considering one plane flew and successfully landed with half the top missing, I think movies might exaggerate the risk a bit. Shocking, I know...
Re:TSA's Head of Security 'Removed' from Office
by ceejayoz on Tuesday May 24, 2016 @09:59AM
(#11761531)
The plane you're referencing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aloha_Airlines_Flight_243
And no, folks, "half the top missing" isn't hyperbole.
Re:TSA's Head of Security 'Removed' from Office
by frostburg on Tuesday May 24, 2016 @07:53AM
(#11760754)
Not structurally, but you might hit something important.
Re:TSA's Head of Security 'Removed' from Office
by diabeetusman on Tuesday May 24, 2016 @08:44AM
(#11761063)
I can't imagine there's anything "important" enough that would bring down the whole plane with one shot. I mean, sure you might kill a person or two, but pretty much every system is double- or triple-redundant, even the pilot(s).
Re:TSA's Head of Security 'Removed' from Office
by dajohnson89 on Tuesday May 24, 2016 @11:40AM
(#11762440)
What about the issue of depressurizing the cabin?