News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Announcing SyntaxNet: The World’s Most Accurate Natural L... by jweir on Thursday May 12, 2016 @04:47PM (#11686656)
Re:Announcing SyntaxNet: The World’s Most Accurate Natural L... by daveloyall on Thursday May 12, 2016 @05:51PM (#11687049)
Bill, help me name this parser.

What kind of parser is it?

An English parser.

... :)

You know, it's a brilliant name. It's a person's name, like Siri or Cortana. But if they'd named it Jane or John, the mass media would have a fit. So they side-stepped that by making it sound computer-y, while remaining a proper name. Brilliant.

Re:Announcing SyntaxNet: The World’s Most Accurate Natural L... by viraptor on Thursday May 12, 2016 @07:33PM (#11687574)
Most likely it's a joke on the refused Boaty McBoatface vote http://www.latimes.com/travel/la-tr-britain-boaty-mcboatface...
Re:Announcing SyntaxNet: The World’s Most Accurate Natural L... by taneq on Thursday May 12, 2016 @10:50PM (#11688314)
Oh, I hadn't picked that up, that's genius! It's not just a parser of English. It's an English parser (with the sense of humour appropriate thereto).
Re:Announcing SyntaxNet: The World’s Most Accurate Natural L... by Bombthecat on Friday May 13, 2016 @01:53AM (#11688861)
Why is everything English only? :( there are other languages too.

#otherlanguagesmatters

Re:Announcing SyntaxNet: The World’s Most Accurate Natural L... by TeMPOraL on Friday May 13, 2016 @05:36AM (#11689440)
Because we didn't win the II World War... :).

(INB4 yes, that's the reference to an old joke about Lufthansa pilot in Frankfurt complaining he's forced to speak in English to the control tower)

Honestly though, English is a quite good starting language due to its simplicity, but I do hope more attention will be expended on making the technology like this trainable on other languages as well.

Re:Announcing SyntaxNet: The World’s Most Accurate Natural L... by tuukkah on Friday May 13, 2016 @07:11AM (#11689702)
Simplicity!?
Re:Announcing SyntaxNet: The World’s Most Accurate Natural L... by daveloyall on Friday May 13, 2016 @11:13AM (#11690832)
Maybe SyntaxNet could be trained to parse other languages.
Re:Announcing SyntaxNet: The World’s Most Accurate Natural L... by daveloyall on Friday May 13, 2016 @11:20AM (#11690869)
OMG...

According to the section titled "Why is Parsing So Hard For Computers to Get Right?" in the blog post, determining the difference between "An English parser" and "An English parser" .. is Parsey's great strength.

Five stars, would pun again.

Re:Announcing SyntaxNet: The World’s Most Accurate Natural L... by executesorder66 on Friday May 13, 2016 @02:51AM (#11689020)
> But if they'd named it Jane or John, the mass media would have a fit.

Why would they have a fit if Google named it Jane or John?

Re:Announcing SyntaxNet: The World’s Most Accurate Natural L... by ganeshkrishnan on Thursday May 12, 2016 @07:49PM (#11687634)
It's a joke on the boat naming saga
Re:Announcing SyntaxNet: The World’s Most Accurate Natural L... by shawn-butler on Thursday May 12, 2016 @07:40PM (#11687594)
I used to have a woman in my life, pumpkin latte sipping, wanna-be graphic designer and that is how she referred to everything xx-y mc-xx-yface seemingly in an attempt to remain a teenager well into her third decade.

I am so glad to be rid of her vapid nonsense.

It is a silly name and makes me think it is not a serious effort. But names can be deceiving.

Re:Announcing SyntaxNet: The World’s Most Accurate Natural L... by bleachedsleet on Thursday May 12, 2016 @08:03PM (#11687700)
You mean like a primary color scheme that looks like a child's playground?

Seriously though, this is just a joke on an Internet meme. Quit being a buzzkill.

Re:Announcing SyntaxNet: The World’s Most Accurate Natural L... by akaij on Thursday May 12, 2016 @10:59PM (#11688363)
They're not wearing suits to work either, so not really a serious company anyway.
Re:Announcing SyntaxNet: The World’s Most Accurate Natural L... by TJTorola on Thursday May 12, 2016 @05:10PM (#11686821)
Perhaps they were broken hearted that Boaty McBoatface wasn't accepted.
Re:Announcing SyntaxNet: The World’s Most Accurate Natural L... by curiousgal on Thursday May 12, 2016 @07:51PM (#11687644)
It was accepted for a submarine.
Re:Announcing SyntaxNet: The World’s Most Accurate Natural L... by munificent on Thursday May 12, 2016 @08:34PM (#11687822)
But... that's not a boat. Shouldn't it be Subby McSubface?
Re:Announcing SyntaxNet: The World’s Most Accurate Natural L... by d_t_w on Thursday May 12, 2016 @10:10PM (#11688183)
It's the remotely controlled support vehicle.

Remotey Remoteface?

Re:Announcing SyntaxNet: The World’s Most Accurate Natural L... by TeMPOraL on Friday May 13, 2016 @05:36AM (#11689442)
Droney McDroneface?
Re:Announcing SyntaxNet: The World’s Most Accurate Natural L... by dredmorbius on Thursday May 12, 2016 @09:29PM (#11688038)
Subs are boats.
Re:Announcing SyntaxNet: The World’s Most Accurate Natural L... by nevir on Thursday May 12, 2016 @09:52PM (#11688121)
They're subnautical vehicles. They're beneath that.
Re:Announcing SyntaxNet: The World’s Most Accurate Natural L... by johnhenry on Thursday May 12, 2016 @10:41PM (#11688286)
The German name, "Unterseeboat", and the English adaptation, "U-boat" both imply that they are a type of boat.
Re:Announcing SyntaxNet: The World’s Most Accurate Natural L... by dredmorbius on Thursday May 12, 2016 @10:50PM (#11688317)
I'm starting to suspect some dark humour here. But it runs silent, runs deep. And seems to have gotten all wet.
Re:Announcing SyntaxNet: The World’s Most Accurate Natural L... by taneq on Thursday May 12, 2016 @10:51PM (#11688318)
Well I guess in that instance Boaty McFloaty was automatically disqualified.
Re:Announcing SyntaxNet: The World’s Most Accurate Natural L... by alphapapa on Friday May 13, 2016 @12:53AM (#11688711)
Careful now, that's humor, and we frown upon that around these parts. D:
Re:Announcing SyntaxNet: The World’s Most Accurate Natural L... by Bombthecat on Friday May 13, 2016 @01:54AM (#11688867)
Boaty mcdouble?
Re:Announcing SyntaxNet: The World’s Most Accurate Natural L... by Aqueous on Thursday May 12, 2016 @08:52PM (#11687884)
If Parsey McParseface can parse its own name, it is considered what's called self-hosting....
Re:Announcing SyntaxNet: The World’s Most Accurate Natural L... by lawpoop on Thursday May 12, 2016 @11:18PM (#11688418)
... _self-parsing_?
Re:Announcing SyntaxNet: The World’s Most Accurate Natural L... by curiousgal on Thursday May 12, 2016 @07:52PM (#11687649)
Making up for their Gmail April fools fail.
Re:Announcing SyntaxNet: The World’s Most Accurate Natural L... by tomphoolery on Thursday May 12, 2016 @05:42PM (#11686983)
Yeah I'm just happy that SOMEONE here got it.
Re:Announcing SyntaxNet: The World’s Most Accurate Natural L... by gd2 on Thursday May 12, 2016 @05:03PM (#11686775)
Right, is this name for this product a sign that Google is becoming more human, and less engineering extreme sports minded?
Re:Announcing SyntaxNet: The World’s Most Accurate Natural L... by Fennhella on Thursday May 12, 2016 @05:12PM (#11686831)
I think you're reading too much into it (If you're being serious).

Doubt it had any other meaning other than the team just having fun making a quip at the Boaty Mcboatface poll for a ship's name.

Re:Announcing SyntaxNet: The World’s Most Accurate Natural L... by gd2 on Thursday May 12, 2016 @05:17PM (#11686846)
Yes, I was being playful with language, rather than straight serious. But this topic invites that.
Re:Announcing SyntaxNet: The World’s Most Accurate Natural L... by kirykl on Thursday May 12, 2016 @05:18PM (#11686853)
This is from research not production, researchers in my experience are usually up for this type of fun
Re:Announcing SyntaxNet: The World’s Most Accurate Natural L... by matt4077 on Thursday May 12, 2016 @07:14PM (#11687505)
I'm pretty sure the borders between the two are fluid at google.

I also wish middle management were a bit less afraid of such things. You can usually get cool ideas approved in the higher echolons (because a CEO doesn't have to fear too much, or possibly because these people actually are more imaginative).

Names that have meaning, tell a story are incredibly useful for marketing, even if they sometimes sound unprofessional. Exp: 'Plan B' (morning after pill), 'CockroachDB', 'Virgin'.

It's beyond me how anyone could have chosen the predictable public outcry instead of naming that boat Boaty McBoatface. That's probably the least offending name that ever resulted from an internet poll.

Re:Announcing SyntaxNet: The World’s Most Accurate Natural L... by kirykl on Thursday May 12, 2016 @08:11PM (#11687721)
Interesting, this could explain internal acronym products/services. Middle management is the decision maker. Helpy McHelpdesk vs ITHD
Re:Announcing SyntaxNet: The World’s Most Accurate Natural L... by userbinator on Thursday May 12, 2016 @10:11PM (#11688185)
Acronyms develop more because they're concise and so easier to say and use to those who know what it means.

If Helpy McHelpdesk got into widespread use, it'd probably soon become more referred to as the HMH.

Re:Announcing SyntaxNet: The World’s Most Accurate Natural L... by Hannan on Thursday May 12, 2016 @10:34PM (#11688256)
>> That's probably the least offending name that ever resulted from an internet poll.

Indeed. e.g. http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/events/dub-the-dew