Re:Avast: a Chromium fork with critical security checks removed
by morinted on Monday February 08, 2016 @10:55AM
(#11058756)
And with Google planning on banning those fake download buttons, it might alleviate the need for an adblocker. I feel bad installing adblockers on others' computers, but it's helpful for the virus-prone.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Avast: a Chromium fork with critical security checks removed
by m3rc on Monday February 08, 2016 @11:27AM
(#11059007)
Adblockers are a necessity to bring a computer up to the minimum level of security your friends and family need. There is so much malware being served through ads nowadays I wouldn't use any computer and try not to use a phone without adblockers in place
Re:Avast: a Chromium fork with critical security checks removed
by coldpie on Monday February 08, 2016 @01:05PM
(#11059747)
Android phone users may find it useful to know that Firefox for Android works great with uBlock Origin. No more app store popups, audio ads, or sucking down your mobile data.
Re:Avast: a Chromium fork with critical security checks removed
by m3rc on Monday February 08, 2016 @03:43PM
(#11060760)
It's very useful, but I try to encourage everyone I can to root and install a system level adblocker. Not feasible for 100% of people but the more the better.
Re:Avast: a Chromium fork with critical security checks removed
by nickik on Monday February 08, 2016 @05:35PM
(#11061402)
Can you provide some links about these system level adblockers?
Re:Avast: a Chromium fork with critical security checks removed
by dubberx on Monday February 08, 2016 @06:11PM
(#11061668)
I use AdAway from the F-droid catalogue:
Re:Avast: a Chromium fork with critical security checks removed
by m3rc on Monday February 08, 2016 @09:17PM
(#11062588)
I also use AdaWay from the F-Droid repos
Re:Avast: a Chromium fork with critical security checks removed
by jacquesm on Monday February 08, 2016 @11:02AM
(#11058805)
> I feel bad installing adblockers on others' computers, but it's helpful for the virus-prone.
You mean like security researchers?
http://www.networkworld.com/article/3021113/security/forbes-...
Re:Avast: a Chromium fork with critical security checks removed
by distances on Monday February 08, 2016 @11:19AM
(#11058941)
That article strangely claims it's not Forbes' fault if their pages serve malware. Of course it's their fault and responsibility when they have freely chosen to work with this advertisement provider. Of course they should change the agency, and perhaps claim damages, but one can't transfer the responsibility on third parties.