News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:New finding: 600M years ago, a single mutation changed ev... by aggie on Monday January 11, 2016 @05:21PM (#10884044)
Even as someone fully accepting of evolutionary theory, this diagram felt like a revelation: http://i58.servimg.com/u/f58/17/30/76/23/evolut10.jpg
Re:New finding: 600M years ago, a single mutation changed ev... by nimbs on Monday January 11, 2016 @06:00PM (#10884289)
Re:New finding: 600M years ago, a single mutation changed ev... by emmelaich on Monday January 11, 2016 @06:13PM (#10884358)
I prefer @aggie's because it refers to actual species.
Re:New finding: 600M years ago, a single mutation changed ev... by emmelaich on Monday January 11, 2016 @11:26PM (#10885548)
Also the use of words like "developed" in the text of the second is unfortunate.
Re:New finding: 600M years ago, a single mutation changed ev... by fiatjaf on Monday January 11, 2016 @05:52PM (#10884227)
The mutation from 4 to 5 is enourmous.
Re:New finding: 600M years ago, a single mutation changed ev... by InclinedPlane on Monday January 11, 2016 @07:37PM (#10884763)
It's not a single step, it's just one sign post on a long highway (you can't show all of them). Every step along the way is pretty straightforward and immediately useful.

Eyes are an interesting example, because they are seemingly incredibly complex systems, yet eyes have evolved independently dozens of times. For example, octopuses and humans have equivalently complex eyes which have entirely different origins and have slight differences (for example, human eyes have a blind spot due to the nerve fibers being on top of instead of behind the light receptors).

Re:New finding: 600M years ago, a single mutation changed ev... by Dylan16807 on Monday January 11, 2016 @06:16PM (#10884378)
It is, but it's easy to imagine the continuum in your head. The lens getting sharper, getting muscles to shift it, the cornea getting clearer...

Seeing how you go from nothing to spot to pinhole lens eye is the critical part.

Re:New finding: 600M years ago, a single mutation changed ev... by trhway on Monday January 11, 2016 @07:18PM (#10884684)
i wonder about the evolution from 5 to 6 (along the lines of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geordi_La_Forge)
Re:New finding: 600M years ago, a single mutation changed ev... by CaptSpify on Monday January 11, 2016 @06:22PM (#10884413)
I can't find the clip, but cosmos has a great segment on this. Here's a non-animated view: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SHgHI8YnsF8&feature=youtu.be...

Basically, they go through each of those stages, and shows what it would look like from the creatures point of view

Re:New finding: 600M years ago, a single mutation changed ev... by fiatjaf on Monday January 11, 2016 @05:52PM (#10884225)
I don't understand what is the good from passing from 1 to 2 or 2 to 3.
Re:New finding: 600M years ago, a single mutation changed ev... by PhasmaFelis on Tuesday January 12, 2016 @01:55AM (#10885961)
In 1, light from any direction will fall on all the pigment cells equally. Essentially, your camera only has a single pixel--you can't tell direction at all, only degree of brightness.

In 2, light centered on the cup will fall on all the cells, but light from the side will be occluded by the edge of the cup and only fall on one side. Now you have a low-resolution camera, and can roughly tell which direction light is coming from.

In 3, light from any angle will only light up a small part of the cup's interior, allowing for greater precision--effectively, higher resolution.

Re:New finding: 600M years ago, a single mutation changed ev... by InclinedPlane on Monday January 11, 2016 @06:03PM (#10884306)
From 1 to 2 you get directionality. 2 to 3 improves directionality a great deal (it's basically a continuum from depression to pinhole eye).
Re:New finding: 600M years ago, a single mutation changed ev... by tamana on Monday January 11, 2016 @05:56PM (#10884262)
More light collection and higher resolution of details
Re:New finding: 600M years ago, a single mutation changed ev... by DrScump on Monday January 11, 2016 @05:57PM (#10884272)
Did the original accompanying text say that each step was a single mutation, or is this just general evolution of sight?