News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:New finding: 600M years ago, a single mutation changed ev... by fiatjaf on Monday January 11, 2016 @05:52PM (#10884225)
I don't understand what is the good from passing from 1 to 2 or 2 to 3.
Re:New finding: 600M years ago, a single mutation changed ev... by PhasmaFelis on Tuesday January 12, 2016 @01:55AM (#10885961)
In 1, light from any direction will fall on all the pigment cells equally. Essentially, your camera only has a single pixel--you can't tell direction at all, only degree of brightness.

In 2, light centered on the cup will fall on all the cells, but light from the side will be occluded by the edge of the cup and only fall on one side. Now you have a low-resolution camera, and can roughly tell which direction light is coming from.

In 3, light from any angle will only light up a small part of the cup's interior, allowing for greater precision--effectively, higher resolution.

Re:New finding: 600M years ago, a single mutation changed ev... by InclinedPlane on Monday January 11, 2016 @06:03PM (#10884306)
From 1 to 2 you get directionality. 2 to 3 improves directionality a great deal (it's basically a continuum from depression to pinhole eye).
Re:New finding: 600M years ago, a single mutation changed ev... by tamana on Monday January 11, 2016 @05:56PM (#10884262)
More light collection and higher resolution of details