But it doesn't matter. What he needs to understand is that there's absolutely no shame whatsoever in the "web dev" role precisely because it covers so many different levels of ability. He sees his own skills as lacking and therefore concludes that his title is a title of shame, whereas what he should be thinking about is the fact that a lot of real bad-ass coders share that title. Get better at what you do and what you're interested in, rather than chasing what you think sounds cool to others but you have no actual interest in.
OP, I know a guy who spent a couple of decades as a C/asm bad-ass and was recently forced to learn some HTML/CSS/JS in order to put a web front-end on a project. He's completely hooked and I don't think he's going back. There literally is no level of expertise implied by the term "web dev."
I'm angry that people throw these destructive opinions like " oh poo poo. X isn't real work" out in life because not everyone can be strong enough to not doubt themselves.
It's always a good thing to ask oneself if the thoughts one projects to the rest of the world can serve the purpose of raising the quality of someone's life.
If you read this OP, shake yourself. Write down on 3 papers,
I Must Be Happy
I Must Be Stable
I Must Keep Learning
And on your table paste a smaller note.
If you are always moving forward, then you have no reason to be unhappy with who you are today.
This may sound hokem mantraish "oh that's a nice sentiment" advice, but our minds are more malleable than we know. Just like you can feed it destructive thoughts and ruin the good in your life, you can do the opposite and it will work.
Good luck!
I appreciate people "who can only do CSS".
CSS is underrated skill but experienced CSS developer has to know about:
- every browser quirk possible.
- various standard hacks to workaround these quirks
- preprocessors like Sass or Less
- tons of completely non-logical CSS rules (eg: `margin: auto` will center only horizontally but not vertically )
- methodologies like BEM, OCSS or SMACSS
- CSS frameworks like Bootstrap or Foundation
- CSS specifity, z-index stacking rules etc.
- responsive web development
- basic JavaScript also can be helpful
etc.
And he/she has to be good at communication with graphic/ux designers and be super patient (`2px left, please`, `change color for 3% brighter, please`, `slow down this transition and insert 2px border` etc.) And good eye for details also is needed.
So I don't think that someone "who can only do CSS" is worse than programmer. I think the opposite is true: programming is pretty damn easy comparing to sitting all day and trying to randomly tweak CSSes to make website look as it was designed by graphic/ux designers.
This is the reason I hate writing CSS. I like programming though. Because programming it's a looot easier.
Programming is logical. You tell computer what to do and computer does it. If it does not, you debug and eventually you win. CSS is not logical so IMHO it's harder.
Hah. Not even possible anymore. Used to be before mobile, but as far as I can tell with mobile there is nobody who knows where all the bodies are buried.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/23142762/how-to-identify-...
Sure it is. I know people who make a living at setting up Wordpress. They do it very well, and they work hard at it. They do design work that I cannot hope to match. And they do it all without writing any more code than some HTML and CSS.
I'm not going to insult them by saying that they are not developing web sites. They absolutely are.
Coders do not own the label of "web developer". Because that is all it is -- a label.
Call yourself whatever you want to call yourself. Let others do the same.
FWIW, when people ask what I do, I no longer get specific. I just say, "I write software."
Uploading Wordpress, using standard themes and installing plugins isn't development, it's admin.
On the other hand, building custom themes or writing custom plugins is web development.
Doctors are all doctors, but there is a difference between a family doctor and a neurosurgeon. Lawyers are all lawyers, but a patent attorney is not a criminal litigation specialist.
It is fine to have a generic term for a broad profession, then get more specific if and when it matters.
Perhaps, though, I can still refer to these people as "developers."
At my company where I'm the back-end guy, our front-end guy does most of the Javascript, but he has to get my help whenever he has to do anything non-trivial. Only a few projects a year ever has him needing my assistance.
Most companies' Javascript needs should be similar. Every once in awhile there will be a marketing push wih non-trivial Javascript needs, most of the time they can get by with basic jQuery. Hide this element, show it when there's an event.
Unless you're working for a news agency, making Snowfall every month, I'd be surprised if the business actually did need more. Of course, if the front-end guy decides he has to learn React, well, I'd say, go ahead, knock yourself out. But don't kid yourself into believing it's really necessary.
The reason I'm interested in it is it's the opposite of the web. It requires small, deliberate programming as opposed to the bloat fest web programming has become. It's also physical, whereas web programming is entirely non-physical. After spending so much time in these digital worlds I've been a part of, I want to build real, physical things.
Things just fell that way. I had absolutely no interest whatsoever in programming for the web or the web at all. Then I was involved in an event that had no money and needed a web site. Which led to another. Long story short, own my own web dev company for 11 years and 10 employees and making more money than ever before.
I walked away there because I strongly prefer learning a new frontend build pipeline every week over using ancient compilers on piles of legacy code. In many ways, web dev is where the edge cuts. But neither is better or worse, and there's fools and geniuses everywhere.