News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Gravity Kills Schrödinger's Cat by JadeNB on Saturday June 20, 2015 @06:19PM (#9751243)
What if the light cones of A and B don't intersect at all? There are certainly places in the universe so far apart that light not only can't now, but could never, have travelled from one to the other; that is part of why the near-isotropy of background radiation is something that needs to be explained, I thought.
Re:Gravity Kills Schrödinger's Cat by simonh on Sunday June 21, 2015 @05:22AM (#9752763)
Are there regions of the universe that have never been causally connected? They all originated in the same event, so I'd be surprised if that's true, but I'm no expert. I know cosmic inflation during the big bang was superluminal, but I have to concede I'm not completely familiar with the consequences of that, so good point.
Re:Gravity Kills Schrödinger's Cat by JadeNB on Sunday June 21, 2015 @09:53AM (#9753429)
Indeed, the fact that they are moving apart at superluminal speeds is exactly why they have never been causally connected. The fact that such non-causally connected islands still "look the same" is called the horizon problem (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horizon_problem), and it is one of the issues that Guth's inflation might solve (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inflation_(cosmology)#Horizon_...).