News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bruce Schneier: China and Russia Almost Definitely Have t... by gizmo686 on Saturday June 20, 2015 @06:15PM (#9751233)
You need mutual spying, but if you have that, then the week country will know that it is 100% vulnerable to first strike, and surrender before it comes to that.
Re:Bruce Schneier: China and Russia Almost Definitely Have t... by oofabz on Saturday June 20, 2015 @08:36PM (#9751589)
I'm not so sure you can count on a country to act in rational self-interest. Individual people aren't so good at that, and collectives can be less rational than individuals.
Re:Bruce Schneier: China and Russia Almost Definitely Have t... by tsotha on Saturday June 20, 2015 @06:41PM (#9751286)
That never, ever happens.
Re:Bruce Schneier: China and Russia Almost Definitely Have t... by Retra on Saturday June 20, 2015 @07:23PM (#9751398)
How would you know that?
Re:Bruce Schneier: China and Russia Almost Definitely Have t... by tsotha on Saturday June 20, 2015 @08:24PM (#9751559)
Give me one historical example.
Re:Bruce Schneier: China and Russia Almost Definitely Have t... by Retra on Saturday June 20, 2015 @10:46PM (#9751942)
You want me to give an example of something I'm claiming we don't know?
Re:Bruce Schneier: China and Russia Almost Definitely Have t... by tsotha on Saturday June 20, 2015 @11:44PM (#9752070)
Surely if this is possible you could find one example in all of human history.
Re:Bruce Schneier: China and Russia Almost Definitely Have t... by Retra on Sunday June 21, 2015 @01:13AM (#9752287)
If I had better knowledge of military history, maybe. But I find it extremely unlikely that there has never been a situation where somebody knew some secret about their enemy that encouraged them into a concession instead of resistance. I mean, it happens in legal situations every day.