edit: Even if they only have 1 exabyte of storage, that's enough to keep 3.3 gigabytes of data for every single person in America (~300 million). I would wager that's more than enough to store the text from everyone's email for many years.
Given that the 1 exabyte is a low order estimate given the size of the Utah data centre, you have to wonder just exactly what they are actually storing or planning to store there. If someone had access to it (and I'm not saying I think the NSA do), the site is physically big enough that you could fit sufficient storage to keep years worth of voice recordings of the total global phone call volume.
https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/05/05/nsa-speech-rec...
http://www.ibm.com/systems/storage/tape/ts4500/index.html
The Utah Data Center has at least 100,000 square-feet of data center space. If just half of that space was used for storage then it would be over 27 exabytes worth of storage assuming a density similar to what IBM offers.
Backblaze on the other hand has their Storage Pod 4.5 which can hold up to 270 GB of storage for less than $20,000. https://www.backblaze.com/blog/storage-pod-4-5-tweaking-a-pr...
Which, according to the article runs less than $10000 (180 TB * 1000 GB/TB * .048 $/GB = $8640 )
270 TB is using 6 TB drives.
Backblaze uses 4 TB drives because of the increased costs and failure rates of the 6 TB drives.
https://www.backblaze.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/bl...
(270 TB * 1000 GB/TB * .051 $/GB = $13770 )
My original estimate of $20,000 was just a rough estimate that added some padding for overhead and accessories.
No, but you're paying the bill for your own tracking. Much easier to spend other people's money.
Right now, that recorder is temporarily paused for the most part.
Which one of us is right?