News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Norwegian butter crisis (2011) by hultner on Wednesday May 20, 2015 @05:06AM (#9575210)
Who says that you can't be an entrepreneurial criminal? I wouldn't see them as contradicting terms.
Re:Norwegian butter crisis (2011) by unwind on Wednesday May 20, 2015 @05:21AM (#9575247)
Nobody, it's just that especially around here "entrepreneurial" carries positive connotations as far as I know, and I just wanted to point out that all kinds of profit-making perhaps aren't equally awesome.
Re:Norwegian butter crisis (2011) by zyx321 on Wednesday May 20, 2015 @06:01AM (#9575336)
On the other hand, especially around here "regulation" carries negative connotations as far as I know, and pointing out the obvious isn't going to make people suddenly endorse protectionism.
Re:Norwegian butter crisis (2011) by meric on Wednesday May 20, 2015 @05:37AM (#9575284)
If people are to associate entrepreneurial qualities as positive no matter the underlying activity then that is their prerogative. I don't think the author of that comment should change his choice of words. I suppose the word 'enterprising' might suit your tastes better while still conveying the intelligence of the perpetrators.
Re:Norwegian butter crisis (2011) by trhway on Wednesday May 20, 2015 @05:48AM (#9575310)
what is wrong with smuggling? Especially with the kind of smuggling mentioned here? In that situation it was a very victimless crime and one can see how it was even beneficial to the public.
Re:Norwegian butter crisis (2011) by lmz on Wednesday May 20, 2015 @06:01AM (#9575337)
Smugglers don't pay import tariffs. From the article:

> Shortages persisted as a result of high import tariffs on butter to protect the domestic dairy industry against foreign competition

Re:Norwegian butter crisis (2011) by bmmayer1 on Wednesday May 20, 2015 @10:54AM (#9576708)
Import tariffs are the crime, then, not the smuggling.