News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Apparently transparent – CSS3D HTML5 Experiment. Parent comment

Re:Apparently transparent – CSS3D HTML5 Experiment by matthewmacleod on Thursday February 19, 2015 @06:09AM (#9073458)
Flexbox, or display: table-cell.

These have been supported for a while now – you're not going to get old browser support, but they're not going to support 3D features either, so your complaint is either flame bait or ignorance.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Apparently transparent – CSS3D HTML5 Experiment by bonn1 on Thursday February 19, 2015 @06:34AM (#9073525)
> These have been supported for a while now

For Safari still the -webkit prefix is required which is a bit odd

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Apparently transparent – CSS3D HTML5 Experiment by zghst on Thursday February 19, 2015 @01:52PM (#9076018)
Webkit keeps prefixes usually because it is not implemented fully and it is an experimental feature. They began unprefixing flexbox in Sept. 2014, I don't know when it's gonna ship.

Though, its super unfair that the Web Inspector in Webkit uses unprefixed Flexbox (http://trac.webkit.org revision 173707).

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Apparently transparent – CSS3D HTML5 Experiment by bicknergseng on Thursday February 19, 2015 @11:47AM (#9075013)
Safari is the new IE. No idea why they still require vendor prefix for a range of accepted and implemented standards.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Apparently transparent – CSS3D HTML5 Experiment by kowdermeister on Thursday February 19, 2015 @06:51AM (#9073564)
The world is a cruel place :)
[ Parent | on HN ]