How Google determined our right to be forgotten

Re:How Google determined our right to be forgotten by amelius on Wednesday February 18, 2015 @05:54AM (#9067864)

Perhaps it is better to judge an article by its contents only.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How Google determined our right to be forgotten by spinlock on Wednesday February 18, 2015 @01:09PM (#9069971)

I couldn't disagree more. All news sources editorialize. Knowing their slant and accounting for it is the only way to find truth in their writing.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How Google determined our right to be forgotten by rdxm on Wednesday February 18, 2015 @07:24AM (#9068117)

Privacy is a much larger topic than Google. The point I am making is that it's a bit past disingenuous to hold forth on a topic when you are not an honest broker in the overall topic itself..

Find the down votes interesting though...heh...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How Google determined our right to be forgotten by mkr-hn on Wednesday February 18, 2015 @08:30AM (#9068357)

A hypocrite can still be right.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How Google determined our right to be forgotten by tomtoise on Wednesday February 18, 2015 @06:35AM (#9067965)

I hear Mein Kampf is a really good read. Edit: Wow. Downvote flurry. What I mean is that to take an article without the context of author is ridiculous. Perhaps I was a little bit too snide.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How Google determined our right to be forgotten by RyanMcGreal on Wednesday February 18, 2015 @07:14AM (#9068088)

Reductio ad Hitlerum is rarely a constructive addition to a debate.

[ Parent | on HN ]