News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How Google determined our right to be forgotten by rdxm on Wednesday February 18, 2015 @05:38AM (#9067828)
Sorry, but who can take The Guardian, and by extension the NYT seriously while they are sitting on a bunch of the Snowden material? Whining about Google when you are withholding the stuff on privacy that really matters due to a lack of moral courage is weak-sauce...
Re:How Google determined our right to be forgotten by spacecowboy_lon on Wednesday February 18, 2015 @05:56AM (#9067866)
And of course the right to be forgotten doesn't apply to the press - The guardian is a bad as the murdoc press in some ways.

They would always drag out Max Mosley's private life when writing about Formula One is one example.

Re:How Google determined our right to be forgotten by amelius on Wednesday February 18, 2015 @05:54AM (#9067864)
Perhaps it is better to judge an article by its contents only.
Re:How Google determined our right to be forgotten by spinlock on Wednesday February 18, 2015 @01:09PM (#9069971)
I couldn't disagree more. All news sources editorialize. Knowing their slant and accounting for it is the only way to find truth in their writing.
Re:How Google determined our right to be forgotten by rdxm on Wednesday February 18, 2015 @07:24AM (#9068117)
Privacy is a much larger topic than Google. The point I am making is that it's a bit past disingenuous to hold forth on a topic when you are not an honest broker in the overall topic itself..

Find the down votes interesting though...heh...

Re:How Google determined our right to be forgotten by mkr-hn on Wednesday February 18, 2015 @08:30AM (#9068357)
A hypocrite can still be right.
Re:How Google determined our right to be forgotten by tomtoise on Wednesday February 18, 2015 @06:35AM (#9067965)
I hear Mein Kampf is a really good read. Edit: Wow. Downvote flurry. What I mean is that to take an article without the context of author is ridiculous. Perhaps I was a little bit too snide.
Re:How Google determined our right to be forgotten by RyanMcGreal on Wednesday February 18, 2015 @07:14AM (#9068088)
Reductio ad Hitlerum is rarely a constructive addition to a debate.