News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A growing desire to avoid gluten is changing the food ind... by Karellen on Sunday October 26, 2014 @07:19PM (#8512917)
The "processing" of wheat is simply grinding it, in a mill[0]. The ears are literally just physically broken down into small pieces. No chemicals are added, and ideally no chemical reactions happen within the wheat/flour. Certainly gluten is not a product of the milling process; it is a protein that exists in the original ears of wheat[1].

Also, the process of milling cannot be described as cooking by any reasonable defintion of the word, so I'm not sure what you mean by wheat being "raw" in a way that flour is not. Unless you count finely chopped ingredients as no longer being "raw".

[0] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gristmill

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheat

Re:A growing desire to avoid gluten is changing the food ind... by brc on Sunday October 26, 2014 @07:40PM (#8512997)
You make the point better than I did.

I would also add that, by this definition, any animal product eaten is processed - even eggs - which are cracked and then usually cooked. Ground beef is extremely processed - having been butchered and then fed through a grinder.

You can theoretically grow your own wheat and grind your own flour. If you can do it yourself without a food factory and secret ingredients, then I don't think it fits any reasonable definition of 'processed'.

Re:A growing desire to avoid gluten is changing the food ind... by simonmales on Monday October 27, 2014 @06:47AM (#8514749)
Cool I see your point.

In my mind grinding is processing. It is being processed so we can make something something else out of it. Would you eat it on its own?

I broadly wipe that anything that can't be done with ones hands is processed. But that opens the question if cooking meat is considered processing.

I can't see prehistoric man grinding wheat to make a meal.

Re:A growing desire to avoid gluten is changing the food ind... by DanBC on Monday October 27, 2014 @06:49AM (#8514755)
Wheat is used in many recipes without being ground into flour. See cracked wheat or bulgar wheat for examples.

Cooking meat causes chemical changes - maillard reaction. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maillard_reaction

Many low tech cultures use carbs obtained from crushing or pulping grains. The reason they don't use wheat is not because of the need for grinding but because of the need for agriculture.

Re:A growing desire to avoid gluten is changing the food ind... by undersuit on Sunday October 26, 2014 @07:46PM (#8513013)
> No chemicals are added

To be pedantic, chemicals are added to fortified and enriched flour... perfectly harmless chemicals that were lost in the milling process.

Re:A growing desire to avoid gluten is changing the food ind... by mudetroit on Sunday October 26, 2014 @08:17PM (#8513129)
Being even more pedantic, fortified and enriched flour is normally created because the base product was bleached, not because of milling.
Re:A growing desire to avoid gluten is changing the food ind... by undersuit on Monday October 27, 2014 @04:25PM (#8517957)
The removal of the wheat germ is the primary reason for re-adding the nutrients, without the germ, and the bran, you just have a large amount of starch in the endosperm.
Re:A growing desire to avoid gluten is changing the food ind... by simonmales on Monday October 27, 2014 @06:39AM (#8514728)
Well aware that gluten is not a product of the milling process. Never said that either.
Re:A growing desire to avoid gluten is changing the food ind... by DanBC on Monday October 27, 2014 @06:47AM (#8514751)
You have repeatedly called flour a processed ingredient; and linked that processing to gluten.

It's not surprising that people think you're claiming that milling flour is "processing" it, or that you think gluten is a result of whatever people are doing to flour.