undersuit

Other people are dismissing this idea right off the cuff because of the arsenic concentration but that's a good thing. Now we use it as a feed stock for arsenic loving single celled creature. Then we concentrate it further. And again and again until you have arsenic pure enough for use. Then you can add that arsenic back into the pesticide and herbicide production processes that helped it get into the seawater instead of mining it on land.

I think bringing back the glaciers would expose more human sites on coastlines than melting them to expose smatterings of mountain sites.

Oh, I guess we read different articles. Happens sometimes.

The information being released and then news coming out about it is suspicious? Or is there some bias you're being cagey about?

It's almost like the news is being reported. Very suspicious.

Can't they just get credit from the free market?

Are you arguing that the government shouldn't be prepared?

Has China invaded any countries or captured any foreign leaders this year?

I noticed a machine of my was using a Chinese mirror for Debian apt. Switching to the US apt source brought in updates to cacerts and libbrotli. Not trying to insinuate anything, my mirror was just outdated, and yours (plural) could be too.

If your database gets bigger does the software get better too?

Can't, I'm unable to reach twitter support until I've scanned my finger prints on the app.

You don't know how many people have already quit. You don't know how many will quit. But you do know that someone that quits also loses any influence they have on the decisions.

A 1 hour old post on a Sunday morning is not conclusive for anything.

Try another subreddit.

American, here. Yes he is one of the dumbshits. https://www.thecanary.co/global/world-analysis/2024/08/30/ma...

Do I call what Facebook or Meta? You are talking about two separate things.

Good I still don't want to know the password. If the first stage hash is compromised there are bigger issues, bigger than even if the database of hashes or passwords got hacked.

Don't store the hash the client sent you. Hash the hash on the server side.

Hash the hash.

There is a comparison.

>then a hacker stealing password hashes would enable them to instantly log in, without cracking them

How do you know the hashed value stored in the database is the same hashed value the user submitted? Server side I can add a salt and hash more before storing or comparing.

>But the true password still has to be transmitted. The first time, and every time.

The password never has to be transferred. In fact never having the password should be the goal. Not even a first time. Don't let the password leave their device. You transmit the hash.

It should be a default then not a suggestion we pass around in tech forums.

Just make sure you trust the cauldron you choose.

Never said otherwise.

Do I know what a man in the middle attack is? You mean one of the focuses of the parent comment? Let's go with a yes.

>Meanwhile passkeys are completely invulnerable.

Not according to the parent comment and the article.

Available.

>Passwords always require full transmission.

Into a hash algorithm not to a remote server.

>Nothing else available to the average user does.

Literally every person could use a unique password for each login.

Because they increased the demand so much they are seeking out their own supply. Nuclear has consistently been panned for decades because it's more expensive than other power generation.

Why not the person who thought to stage the match? They had arguably more input in the win.