Re:A Watch Guy's Thoughts on the Apple Watch After Seeing It...
by Aloha on Thursday September 11, 2014 @03:56AM
(#8301379)
Sometimes the 50 dollar watch performs better than the 10k one - Rolexes keep lousy time. I personally am quite the fan of the Seiko 5, it works, keeps time (when I remember to set it after not wearing it for four days), and at the least it will act as a decent chronometer even if I've not set it, I can tell how much time has elapsed by looking at it twice.
I don't know if I have a use case for the apple watch, I might buy one to try out, see if it works, but I will say -if nothing else, its uniformly a pretty object d'art.
Re:A Watch Guy's Thoughts on the Apple Watch After Seeing It...
by jacquesm on Thursday September 11, 2014 @06:03AM
(#8301702)
It's a digital accessory priced-to-own.
Auto playing link, don't click if your audio is loud:
http://www.cnbc.com/id/101619289
Fairly incredible, expensive watches for rent.
Re:A Watch Guy's Thoughts on the Apple Watch After Seeing It...
by JonnieCache on Thursday September 11, 2014 @10:17AM
(#8302682)
>priced-to-own
What does this phrase mean? Search engines are giving me nothing.
Re:A Watch Guy's Thoughts on the Apple Watch After Seeing It...
by shiftpgdn on Thursday September 11, 2014 @10:43AM
(#8302845)
Affordable for the common man.
Re:A Watch Guy's Thoughts on the Apple Watch After Seeing It...
by easytiger on Thursday September 11, 2014 @05:09AM
(#8301579)
People complaining about the application of a watch for telling time and the accuracy are so disingenuous.
Go an tell that to someone wearing a diamond ring. That doesn't tell the time either.
A $50 watch keeps time just about as good as a $10K watch.
And you might even get to keep the former when you're being held up on the way to your Ferrari.