Talent is roughly the ability to learn and apply that learning. So you want people to have 'constant learning', but ignore that they first have to be capable of learning that material at all.
http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/tennis/tennis-star-to-und...
Surgery to improve sporting performance is OK but steroids are not. Weird, huh?
Talent in intellectual endeavors is hard to define. In the liberal arts it's sort of an awareness for context, and recognizing unique ideas. In the sciences it's often a capability for symbolic manipulation and internal visualization. However, since the brain doesn't have hard physical limitations, much of this can be developed with extensive training, so that slight weaknesses can be overcome.
That's a pretty extraordinary claim.
By comparison, if you would lose your right leg, your body will not grow a new one.