By the way, my post title was changed by someone else. Paypal is NOT banning anything Bitcoin related, they are only banning Bitcoin exchanges for fiat currencies.
Sadly, this is a well-known issue on HN:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6216685
Although that open letter received a lot of attention, nothing has changed since then: No transparency which admin "corrected" the title, not even an indication that this kind of manipulation happened at all. So you as the submitter receive all complaints about the crappy title.
@pg: Note that I fully understand that we HN submitters should not be encouraged to use link-baity names for our submissions. And that we should prefer the original title wherever feasible. But some articles' titles are crap. Some are uninformative, some are misleading, and some titles are even wrong. If it is recommened to remove link-baity numbers from titles ("10 Ways To Do X" -> "How To Do X"), why isn't it equally feasible to replace misleading/wrong titles with informative/correct titles?
I suggested via email that they could let veteran users flag inappropriate (link-baity/editorialized/inaccurate) titles and have moderators change them in that case, but I never received any answer.
They most certainly kill things dealing with crypto-currencies.
The questions is it overly-sensitive anti-fraud, or overly-sensitive anti-competition.
It might very well be incorrect, but "the CEO denied these claims" is very low proof in my book.
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1v12p4/well_done_pa...
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1v3qhw/update_well_...
The OP was selling casascius coins, which contain bitcoin private keys (digital currency) and are therefore against the terms of service. The CS rep the OP talked to incorrectly communicated that ALL bitcoin related items were banned. Later Paypal and their CEO issued a statement clarifying that only digital currencies themselves were banned.
Seriously, it's an anonymous Internet forum. Anything without proof should be assumed as false.
Sigh.
from http://fincen.gov/statutes_regs/guidance/html/FIN-2013-G001....
That particular section may or may not cover Paypal, but certainly you don't get out of the money transmitting rules by not dealing with "money."
I never said that Paypal isn't a money transmitter, nor that there are not any other FinCEN rules both PayPal and others have to follow.
As the other responder pointed out, Paypal would be a money transmitter under FinCEN regulations. What FinCen was saying is that Bitcoin and other digital currencies aren't "currencies" in the legal sense because they have no government backing. However, they are "virtual currencies" in the sense that they otherwise function and behave as true currencies. Consequently, the FinCEN regulations apply to Bitcoin and other digital currencies.
FinCEN further stated that miners and persons who are using Bitcoin in non-currency transactions(i.e., paying for services, physical goods, or non-digital-currency intangible goods) are not subject to the FinCEN regulations because they aren't exchanging one currency for another, directly or indirectly, and they aren't functioning as commercial money transmitters.
https://twitter.com/davidmarcus/status/422632561882316800
https://twitter.com/davidmarcus/status/422632849670299648