Re:Blogger’s Incarceration Raises First Amendment Questions
by grecy on Saturday January 11, 2014 @10:23PM
(#7045015)
The insane have no right to free speech?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Blogger’s Incarceration Raises First Amendment Questions
by barrecan on Saturday January 11, 2014 @10:34PM
(#7045045)
I think he might be referring to his treatment in court.
Re:Blogger’s Incarceration Raises First Amendment Questions
by nwhitmore on Saturday January 11, 2014 @10:34PM
(#7045043)
If they have 1st Amendment rights, do they also have 2nd Amendment rights?
Re:Blogger’s Incarceration Raises First Amendment Questions
by rosser on Saturday January 11, 2014 @10:48PM
(#7045079)
Neither the 1st nor the 2nd Amendment confer absolute rights. Hence, convicted felons (typically) can't own firearms, and "incitement to violence" isn't considered "speech".
Re:Blogger’s Incarceration Raises First Amendment Questions
by Daniel_Newby on Sunday January 12, 2014 @01:01AM
(#7045318)
The first amendment confers no rights; it restricts congress. The second amendment confers absolute rights; the restrictions on, say, youths and felons are blatantly unconstitutional.
Re:Blogger’s Incarceration Raises First Amendment Questions
by tzs on Sunday January 12, 2014 @02:25AM
(#7045472)
> The second amendment confers absolute rights; the restrictions on, say, youths and felons are blatantly unconstitutional.
Both the Supreme Court and the NRA disagree with you. I think you need to recheck your research.
Re:Blogger’s Incarceration Raises First Amendment Questions
by sliverstorm on Sunday January 12, 2014 @03:49AM
(#7045577)
Youths have basically no rights as far as the constitution is concerned.
Re:Blogger’s Incarceration Raises First Amendment Questions
by tptacek on Sunday January 12, 2014 @11:36AM
(#7046405)
No.
Re:Blogger’s Incarceration Raises First Amendment Questions
by sliverstorm on Sunday January 12, 2014 @02:32PM
(#7047106)
That was helpful, thank you.