News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Blogger’s Incarceration Raises First Amendment Questions. Parent comment

Re:Blogger’s Incarceration Raises First Amendment Questions by rosser on Saturday January 11, 2014 @10:48PM (#7045079)
Neither the 1st nor the 2nd Amendment confer absolute rights. Hence, convicted felons (typically) can't own firearms, and "incitement to violence" isn't considered "speech".
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Blogger’s Incarceration Raises First Amendment Questions by Daniel_Newby on Sunday January 12, 2014 @01:01AM (#7045318)
The first amendment confers no rights; it restricts congress. The second amendment confers absolute rights; the restrictions on, say, youths and felons are blatantly unconstitutional.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Blogger’s Incarceration Raises First Amendment Questions by tzs on Sunday January 12, 2014 @02:25AM (#7045472)
> The second amendment confers absolute rights; the restrictions on, say, youths and felons are blatantly unconstitutional.

Both the Supreme Court and the NRA disagree with you. I think you need to recheck your research.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Blogger’s Incarceration Raises First Amendment Questions by sliverstorm on Sunday January 12, 2014 @03:49AM (#7045577)
Youths have basically no rights as far as the constitution is concerned.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Blogger’s Incarceration Raises First Amendment Questions by tptacek on Sunday January 12, 2014 @11:36AM (#7046405)
No.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Blogger’s Incarceration Raises First Amendment Questions by sliverstorm on Sunday January 12, 2014 @02:32PM (#7047106)
That was helpful, thank you.
[ Parent | on HN ]