The Reliability of Go

Re:The Reliability of Go by sudonim on Sunday October 20, 2013 @06:27PM (#6581813)

We've been using Go in production for 4 or so months at customer.io and have been tremendously happy with the performance. My cofounder will rewrite some core function in go, deploy it to prod and get a 10x improvement. We are total converts.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Reliability of Go by dbaupp on Sunday October 20, 2013 @08:45PM (#6582379)

10x improvement compared to what?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Reliability of Go by jrallison on Monday October 21, 2013 @12:26AM (#6583328)

Our MVP was written in Ruby.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Reliability of Go by danieldk on Monday October 21, 2013 @02:31AM (#6583725)

You know that nearly any compiled language would give such speed-ups compared to Ruby?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Reliability of Go by jrallison on Monday October 21, 2013 @01:19PM (#6586868)

Of course, which was the main driver to moving to a compiled language. We just happened to choose Go :)

I've done a lot of Java and C++ in the past, and wasn't looking to go back to either of those.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Reliability of Go by pjmlp on Monday October 21, 2013 @03:32AM (#6583911)

Maybe even Turbo Basic would do the trick! :)

[ Parent | on HN ]