News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The Reliability of Go. Parent comment

Re:The Reliability of Go by dbaupp on Sunday October 20, 2013 @08:45PM (#6582379)
10x improvement compared to what?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Reliability of Go by jrallison on Monday October 21, 2013 @12:26AM (#6583328)
Our MVP was written in Ruby.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Reliability of Go by danieldk on Monday October 21, 2013 @02:31AM (#6583725)
You know that nearly any compiled language would give such speed-ups compared to Ruby?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Reliability of Go by jrallison on Monday October 21, 2013 @01:19PM (#6586868)
Of course, which was the main driver to moving to a compiled language. We just happened to choose Go :)

I've done a lot of Java and C++ in the past, and wasn't looking to go back to either of those.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Reliability of Go by pjmlp on Monday October 21, 2013 @03:32AM (#6583911)
Maybe even Turbo Basic would do the trick! :)
[ Parent | on HN ]