I find that he is in a good position to do so because C++ evolved based on feedback from people using it and he was responsible for the first version(s).
Nowadays the consensus is that C++ introduced more problems into the industry than it solved. Moreover it keeps introducing more and more problems with each new revision.
In this light his statement is merely an attack upon his critics e.g. "Haters gonna hate..." while ignoring the possibility that criticism of "his" programming language is well founded.
Sure people bitch about every language sometimes. Hell I bitch about languages I use now and then, but I keep using them.
While systems programmers are fleeing from C++ back to C(!!!) and to newer languages like Go (for which the core design principle could be described as "Not C++").
To me his statement sound like a chronic alcoholic saying "There are only bad kids and kids you don't have."
Really?
GCC is now developed in C++.
Clang is developed in C++.
Mac OS X I/O Kit makes use of a C++'s subset.
Windows drivers can be done in C++ since Windows Driver Kit 8, while most new native APIs since Vista are COM based. With Microsoft only supporting enough C99 to comply with C++11/14, while helping porting FOSS C projects to Windows.
OS/400, BeOS and Symbian make use of C++ on the kernel.
Many new NoSQL databases are done in C++.
I see the C usage actually decreasing.
Example? I know of new developments in systems programming written in C++ (LLVM, clang, WebKit, FireFox (or did that start in C?)), I know of some that moved from C to C++ (gcc, maybe FireFox), I know of new developments in C (Linux, git), but I not aware of any system going from C++ to C. They may exist, but I would need more than a few examples to be convinced of the existence of a general trend.
Some time ago there was a shift towards c++,but a large percent are returning back to c.
That's what i recall from surveys from UBM, the company that runs eetimes.com .
Also, for C, there seem to be fewer 'next' projects than 'current' projects, while for C++ those numbers are about equal.
Extrapolating like mad on almost no data, one could argue that C is on the way out in favour of Python, Java, and C#.
.Net is on the decline, though, so there either must be tremendous growth in the use of Mono in embedded software, or that data must be taken with a grain of salt. My money is on the latter, but surprise me.
"People complain about my language, because they use it. If it wasn't good (enough) they would not have used it."
Thus the complaints are relegated from feedback to proof that the choices made were right thus invalidating complaints.
EDIT: In case my point wasn't apparent, the language is under active development by an open, international standardisation committee, of which Stroustrup is an active and prominent member. They are well aware of the complaints, but the problem is that every change involves a tradeoff, and sometimes that tradeoff is just not worth it.