News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

Ask PG: Why no search box?

I just saw that New Mogul has a search box that pipes through to searchyc.com without ruining the site design. I'm sure you've considered adding a search box in the past, but might now be a good time to reconsider?
( 36 comments | 40 points | on HN )
Re:Ask PG: Why no search box? by Banzai10 on Wednesday June 10, 2009 @12:11PM (#651224)
The point is that searchyc is kind of "hidden", a good percent of participants of HN don't even know their existence, maybe a redesign givin more focus to it, or enabling it use in the current design like adding it to the main page would be great. IMHO
Re:Ask PG: Why no search box? by tjic on Wednesday June 10, 2009 @01:13PM (#651352)
Absolutely.

A standard emerged in websites many years back:

* logo in in the upper left (which is also a link to the home page)

* search is a text box in the upper right.

If you're not doing it this way, you're imposing an unnecessary cognitive load on your users.

Re:Ask PG: Why no search box? by iamwil on Wednesday June 10, 2009 @01:28PM (#651379)
I dunno, I find it to be alright. No need to expose everything to a beginning user of HN all at once. I liken it to a game mechanic that you slowly get more items and powers as you work your way through the game. That way, they learn the interface as they go.

It's kinda part of the fun, and if you stick around long enough, you 'discover' (aka level up) little things about HN that increases your skill level at using HN.

Re:Ask PG: Why no search box? by spydez on Wednesday June 10, 2009 @01:12PM (#651348)
Hacker News Toolkit puts a search box on every HN page, among other things.

http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/25039

Re:Ask PG: Why no search box? by TrevorJ on Wednesday June 10, 2009 @12:39PM (#651285)
Maybe it's an intentional flaw to keep people from those "other" sites from flocking here? I'm not 100% serious but sometimes I wonder if in certain cases, ease of usability hinders the maintenance of a community because the barrier to entry is really low?
Re:Ask PG: Why no search box? by euroclydon on Wednesday June 10, 2009 @11:59AM (#651186)
There is a lot of data on this site, and a few months ago, PG had to do upgrade the server to handle the traffic. If he added search, is it possible that all those queries would kill site performance?
Re:Ask PG: Why no search box? by sounddust on Wednesday June 10, 2009 @12:09PM (#651221)
Just put a form in the header that submits directly to searchYC; that would be good enough and would put no strain on HN.

Without an easily accessible link, it's difficult to search content on the site. I've been a member for a long time, and I didn't know that searchYC existed until reading this post (previously I had been using Google, which isn't so great at indexing HN).

Re:Ask PG: Why no search box? by bdfh42 on Wednesday June 10, 2009 @11:53AM (#651171)
HN readers are expected to know how to use Google to search a single site.
Re:Ask PG: Why no search box? by mattyb on Wednesday June 10, 2009 @11:54AM (#651177)
SearchYC is much better.
Re:Ask PG: Why no search box? by jackowayed on Wednesday June 10, 2009 @12:23PM (#651252)
He could even just put the search box on the submit page with a label like "Want to check if it's already been submitted? search for it:", as a way to reduce duplicate submissions.
Re:Ask PG: Why no search box? by jonursenbach on Wednesday June 10, 2009 @12:54PM (#651316)
Re:Ask PG: Why no search box? by baguasquirrel on Wednesday June 10, 2009 @01:13PM (#651351)
Here's an idea. Allow searching of your "saved" items. Then people will be doubly encouraged not to upvote pointless crap.
Re:Ask PG: Why no search box? by zacharydanger on Wednesday June 10, 2009 @12:00PM (#651191)
Sounds like a job for Greasemonkey. Wouldn't be too hard to add a box that submits to searchyc.com/<your_query>
Re:Ask PG: Why no search box? by zacharydanger on Wednesday June 10, 2009 @12:49PM (#651307)
http://github.com/zacharydanger/greasemonkey-searchyc/tree/m... -- Github seems to be erroring out, but you can

  git clone [email protected]:zacharydanger/greasemonkey-searchyc.git
for a peak at a search box that hits searchyc.com
Re:Ask PG: Why no search box? by timae on Wednesday June 10, 2009 @12:47PM (#651305)
Not hard at all (see my "wunbar" comment above).
Re:Ask PG: Why no search box? by chanux on Wednesday June 10, 2009 @12:39PM (#651283)
Like to see the HNsearch button (in footer) replaced by a Search box.
[deleted]
Re:Ask PG: Why no search box? by timae on Wednesday June 10, 2009 @12:44PM (#651297)
I made "wunbar" recently, which allows you to use searchyc from your firefox toolbar (or from wunbar.com) along with many other sites (google, etc.)
Re:Ask PG: Why no search box? by empone on Wednesday June 10, 2009 @01:36PM (#651391)
i made a yubnub command http://yubnub.org/kernel/man?args=yc
Re:Ask PG: Why no search box? by erlanger on Wednesday June 10, 2009 @11:59AM (#651185)
And why no inbox?
Re:Ask PG: Why no search box? by icey on Wednesday June 10, 2009 @12:03PM (#651205)
He asked about it previously and people said they didn't want it.

http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28085

Re:Ask PG: Why no search box? by Sephr on Wednesday June 10, 2009 @12:08PM (#651219)
I think erlanger was talking about an inbox like reddit's where it just shows replies to your comments. A messaging feature is a little different and the messages would be private like email.
Re:Ask PG: Why no search box? by htsh on Wednesday June 10, 2009 @12:27PM (#651260)
that and a search would be welcome additions. messaging is kinda pointless, but the little envelope that changes color when you have a reply is a fantastic usability feature. search would also be nice but can be pretty easily done with google...
Re:Ask PG: Why no search box? by htsh on Wednesday June 10, 2009 @11:19PM (#652219)
stupid me. just realized that the "threads" link does what i was looking for.
Re:Ask PG: Why no search box? by kylec on Wednesday June 10, 2009 @12:32PM (#651272)
With regard to a messaging feature, it might be nice to be able to contact some people here via email (or allow yourself to be contacted) without having to reveal your email address in your profile.
Re:Ask PG: Why no search box? by icey on Wednesday June 10, 2009 @12:32PM (#651271)
Oh yeah. I'd totally like that too! (In fact, I just made a mention about how nice it would be yesterday)
Re:Ask PG: Why no search box? by erlanger on Wednesday June 10, 2009 @02:19PM (#651473)
Yes, this is what I was referring to.
Re:Ask PG: Why no search box? by cellis on Wednesday June 10, 2009 @01:00PM (#651328)
That was 2 years ago. I would welcome messaging and search, and I think if he put it to a vote now he would be pleasantly surprised to get a different answer than he did then.
Re:Ask PG: Why no search box? by iamwil on Wednesday June 10, 2009 @01:24PM (#651364)
I'd rather not have messaging. Then as in now, that's what email is for. Don't need another place to check for messages.

As for search, even though it's another step, searchyc.com does a good enough job. maybe all pg needs is a form with an api to searchyc.

Re:Ask PG: Why no search box? by weaksauce on Wednesday June 10, 2009 @01:33PM (#651387)
I think redirecting to searchyc.com/search+terms+here is all that he would need to do.
Re:Ask PG: Why no search box? by c00p3r on Wednesday June 10, 2009 @11:48AM (#651166)
Good coders code, great - reuse. =)
Re:Ask PG: Why no search box? by c00p3r on Wednesday June 10, 2009 @01:32PM (#651384)
OK, OK =)

  cooper@ubuntu:~/arc3$ grep -r -i search *
  strings.arc:; http://jrgraphix.net/research/unicode_blocks.php?block=1
  cooper@ubuntu:~/arc3$ du -sh .
  312K	.
  cooper@ubuntu:~/arc3$
Re:Ask PG: Why no search box? by vaksel on Wednesday June 10, 2009 @11:45AM (#651157)
they have a different site design, to add a searchbox on the top, he'd have to redesign the header
Re:Ask PG: Why no search box? by antirez on Wednesday June 10, 2009 @11:54AM (#651174)
Not a good reason. There is an important functionality already implemented well by others and all the work to do in HN is to add a small form. Why not?
Re:Ask PG: Why no search box? by icey on Wednesday June 10, 2009 @12:01PM (#651198)
My guess would be the almost Sisyphean feature request list that's still being worked through:

http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=363

Re:Ask PG: Why no search box? by froo on Wednesday June 10, 2009 @12:23PM (#651251)
Well, a cheap hack could be to add it to the footer, I mean where is the immutable law of web design that dictates all search boxes should be at the top of the page?

Personally, it's the current content of HN that interests me first and foremost (the NEW in NEWS). Putting the searchbox in the footer would emphasise this and not break the site design.

Re:Ask PG: Why no search box? by vaksel on Wednesday June 10, 2009 @12:40PM (#651289)
Well we sorta already have that with the HN Search on the bottom. Granted it would work better as a text box, or at least by linking to ycsearch