http://www.bruker.com/products/x-ray-diffraction-and-element...
They are very expensive but they are getting cheaper and smaller every year but those methods are far away from being simple.
By producing a gold-coated bar:
- density could be faked by putting something else in the inside of the bar
- nitric acid test would not work, since the surface is gold
- hardness would not work, if the surface layer is thick enough.
- no idea about magnetism
- other tests?
Not as fancy as X-ray techniques, but much cheaper and readily available
Maybe you can analyse the propagation of mechanical waves within, not sure (so a pure gold bar will 'sound' differently when struck with a soft mallet)
http://nuclearsecrecy.com/blog/2011/11/25/friday-image-posin...
EDIT: I think you meant Tungsten, also known as Wolfram (symbol W): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tungsten
Gold: 19.30 g/cm3 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold)
Wolfram: 19.25 g/cm3 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tungsten)
EDIT2 (I can not reply to your reply): So you meant Depleted Uranium (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depleted_uranium)
Depleted Uranium: 19.1 g/cm3
So Wolfram is a better substitute for Gold, in terms of density. I do not know about prices or other physical properties.
Has a lower density than Tungsten, though so would make a poor counterfeiting material in both cost and physical properties.
The question I suppose is does anybody measure density carefully enough to detect tungsten, and if not, should they be?
Here's a product video of one example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Fu8uLBdgcE
Here's another neat video demo: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rYLxmRsFIWE
Edit: Also, the Curiosity rover has an X-ray fluorescence instrument as part of its "CheMin" spectrometer which it uses for analyzing the composition of Martian minerals.