News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bitcoin vs. Gold by gonvaled on Wednesday April 03, 2013 @04:43AM (#5484958)
And DU would be ...?

EDIT: I think you meant Tungsten, also known as Wolfram (symbol W): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tungsten

Gold: 19.30 g/cm3 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold)

Wolfram: 19.25 g/cm3 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tungsten)

EDIT2 (I can not reply to your reply): So you meant Depleted Uranium (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depleted_uranium)

Depleted Uranium: 19.1 g/cm3

So Wolfram is a better substitute for Gold, in terms of density. I do not know about prices or other physical properties.

Re:Bitcoin vs. Gold by glurgh on Wednesday April 03, 2013 @04:52AM (#5484978)
Pretty sure they meant Depleted Uranium by DU. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depleted_uranium

Has a lower density than Tungsten, though so would make a poor counterfeiting material in both cost and physical properties.

Re:Bitcoin vs. Gold by jlgreco on Wednesday April 03, 2013 @04:56AM (#5484988)
Sorry yes, depleted uranium. Tugnsten also comes close, but not close enough to get it perfect. If you can accurately measure density you could still detect that.

The question I suppose is does anybody measure density carefully enough to detect tungsten, and if not, should they be?