News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Anthropic IPO by neutronicus on Thursday November 12, 2026 @08:51AM (#50467080)
It’s literally a menu in Copilot.

The model is just some REST endpoint you switch out even in a lot of enterprise setups.

Re:Anthropic IPO by sfblah on Thursday November 12, 2026 @09:11AM (#50467419)
It’s weird that people don’t seem to get this. LLMs are the most easily switched-out technology I’ve ever used as an engineer. The input is literally just free-form text.
Re:Anthropic IPO by disgruntledphd2 on Thursday November 12, 2026 @09:26AM (#50467783)
> It’s weird that people don’t seem to get this. LLMs are the most easily switched-out technology I’ve ever used as an engineer. The input is literally just free-form text.

It depends, if you're automating business processes (honestly probably where the money is), then you'll need a really comprehensive set of evals and moniotoring to ensure stuff doesn't break if/when you change providers.

If you have none of that, then switching will be very expensive (but it was ever thus).

Re:Anthropic IPO by 72deluxe on Thursday November 12, 2026 @10:46AM (#50469319)
That just means the business automation is not deterministic, and highlights the issue with LLMs. The solution is not to switch providers but instead make the LLMs generate something that is deterministic given the same input.
Re:Anthropic IPO by disgruntledphd2 on Thursday November 12, 2026 @11:06AM (#50469648)
> That just means the business automation is not deterministic, and highlights the issue with LLMs. The solution is not to switch providers but instead make the LLMs generate something that is deterministic given the same input.

I'm thinking of stuff that would typically be outsourced (like compliance stuff for identity verification et al), where it's really really hard to have deterministic rules.

LLMs are definitely a step up in dealing with fuzzy inputs, and enables you to mostly automate stuff that really wasn't feasible before.

But you do need really good evals and monitoring to make this work effectively.

Re:Anthropic IPO by 72deluxe on Thursday November 12, 2026 @11:29AM (#50469997)
Ah that would make sense then. I was thinking strictly in terms of business logic for handling input of data from an external source; sort of glorified data validation and then a decision based on the input data.
Re:Anthropic IPO by disgruntledphd2 on Thursday November 12, 2026 @04:09PM (#50474312)
You'd be crazy to spend LLM money on that, but its probably happening all over the place.
Re:Anthropic IPO by joshheitzman on Thursday November 12, 2026 @03:58PM (#50474177)
> you'll need a really comprehensive set of evals and moniotoring to ensure stuff doesn't break if/when you change providers

Unless your self-hosting open weight models, you need this even if you don't change providers, since you have no control of what's on the other side of the API.

Re:Anthropic IPO by Marazan on Thursday November 12, 2026 @11:32AM (#50470040)
Yeah, it's the absolutely weirdest thing about all of this. People keep telling me I need to up my AI game yet no matter how advanced the tools get I'm still typing stuff into a text box. My skill is typing English. I was already pretty good at that.