Why are you assuming your interlocutor is in favor of Elon or Trump holding their positions? If anything, one should assume he is consistently against all three men being in positions of influence.

fair, but I don’t see any other hot stories crashing a company over a horny CEO. funny how we bring in some moral high ground selectively. if we did this as a whole there wouldn’t be many CEOs or Presidents left in their position, no?

CEOs of Intel, McDonalds, Nestle all fell after similar things came to light.

all three had explicit policies that CEOs violated. if nvidia has the same the ousting should be straight-forward. though I am sure Boards will find loophole in the policy (e.g. "she was not a direct subordinate") if they want to keep CEO around

>> Under Nvidia's code of conduct, employees are instructed to avoid actual or potential conflicts of interest, with "personal relationships" specifically identified as a possible source of such conflicts.

>> The code applies to all employees and board members and provides for disciplinary action, including termination, for violations.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/us/articles/report-nvidia-ceo-had...

Seems pretty clear cut

>Why are you assuming your interlocutor is in favor of Elon or Trump holding their positions?

Doesn't matter if he is. He presents it as some kind of big issue that "No one of character can respect or trust him anymore", which even if true had almost zero impact for all other CEOs doing the same and worse.

Most CEOs are fired for this. There are some exceptions sure but there are always exceptions. In reality, an affair with a subordinate is an express ticket to getting fired in Corporate America.

Only if you get exposed publicly like Huang, and sometimes not even then.

Otherwise nobody gives a shit and it happens all the time.

Isn't this a strawman? Plenty of people want Trump out, but impeachment works differently

do they want Trump out because of his infidelities or for other reasons? even Evangelicals voted for him (twice) so I don’t think it is him F’ing everything that moves

I mean I want trump out for his infidelities as well as allegations of sexual assaults even on minors. I want him out for these reasons and more. I believe also lost the majority vote both times. The US elections being a convoluted mess with tons of corruption and Israeli influence is hardly a reason for why Jensen Huang shouldn’t suffer the consequence for his actions. I say fire him.

he definitely did not lose popular vote in 2024 though… I don’t have a problem if he is fired but questioning why same standard isn’t applied generally? if he is fired, do we start a country-wide crusade to oust every horny CEO?

I said majority vote not popular vote. I don’t blame you for being confused. If Jensen gets fired it won’t be merely due to his unfaithfulness. He put the company at risk by literally screwing a spy and allowing china to bypass export controls.

What do you mean "lost the majority vote"? More people voted for him than anyone else, and he got a majority of the electoral college.

Look up plurality vs majority.

In American English "majority" can mean "plurality", it's a bit weird! [1] Saying "lost the majority vote" when you mean "won the election with under 50%" is bound to confuse people.

[1] https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/majority definition 1.c

I am not making this up, majority vote and popular vote are literal phrases used to describe the results. Please look it up. I agree it’s confusing.

I know you're not making it up, "plurality" is a real word and in a technical context "majority" can be contrasted with "plurality". But even then you really wouldn't say "lost the majority vote" for someone who won an election (try searching for that phrase: none of the hits are people using it like you are).

The majority vote is being used often to indicate whether or not majority actually voted in a given President. In the USA however, majority vote win happens infrequently nowadays, only 4 out of last 9 elections with winner won a majority vote. so perhaps unfair to bring that up, the 2024 was an absolute blowout by USA's standards

Elon is a despicable human being. But you should know his children are usually conceived via IVF, not naturally.

Secondly, no one sane defends our pedophile president so not sure why you bring that up as supporting fact.

77,303,573 did in 2024 election

those were not all votes of support, like last week was mostly not about supporting democrats

Just because he isn't as bad as Elon Musk doesn't mean he's okay

Totally fine to want those people away from positions of responsibility too — I certainly do. Why assume people are arguing for an exceptionally harsh treatment here? (Even though, as the CEO of a public company whose influence on the future arguably outweighs both Musk and Trump, it would be merited)

Thanks for making sure this discussion didn't pass without some classic whataboutism. You're a great service to the people on this site. Keep it up.