Jensen said we have AGI. Can't AGI do his job?

https://www.reddit.com/r/agi/comments/1s7sgg0/nvidias_jensen...

   In this case, Fridman had offered Huang a very unusual metric for AGI: Could AI start and grow a technology business to the point where it was worth $1 billion? Fridman asked if Huang thought AGI by this definition could be achieved within the next five to 20 years.

   Huang said he didn’t think that amount of time was necessary. “I think it’s now. I think we’ve achieved AGI,” he said. He then hedged, noting the company didn’t necessarily have to remain that valuable. “You said a billion,” Huang told Fridman, “and you didn’t say forever.”

And clearly it was ok from a business PoV?

So you think Jobs had reached the end of his inventive streak?

You reckon Apple board shouldn't have voted for his death?

You think Jobs invented the products he was selling? He was a salesman, not an engineer.

Jobs was a product visionary. He wasn’t an engineer, and wasn’t just a salesman.

> Jobs was a product visionary.

I'd like some of what you're smoking. At best I could call him an artist, in the sense that "good artists copy, great artists steal".

have you looked at Apple's stock price and product portfolio since 2011?

You don't think Apple would be worth much more if Jobs was still CEO?

They seem to be doing fine without him

Yes, but they would do even more fine with him. Since Jobs' passing Apple has released only one successful product category: Watch.

AirPods bring in around $18-22 billion annually

RIP but yeah he was a bit rapey and didn't really add anything