Re:Nvidia Is Preparing to Oust Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang
by TheBlight on Wednesday November 11, 2026 @06:13PM
(#50460302)
There's probably a lot more to this than we'll ever know.
Re:Nvidia Is Preparing to Oust Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang
by sparkling on Wednesday November 11, 2026 @06:27PM
(#50460456)
Given that
1/ China is still interested in chips
2/ Chip exports to China will now (presumably) be under even more scrutiny
What would their motivation be to leak this info?
Re:Nvidia Is Preparing to Oust Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang
by ralph84 on Wednesday November 11, 2026 @07:24PM
(#50461099)
Offer Jensen asylum to run a chip company in China
Re:Nvidia Is Preparing to Oust Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang
by bar8uyr on Wednesday November 11, 2026 @07:37PM
(#50461245)
Show of power
Got caught
Kill stock
Maybe?
Re:Nvidia Is Preparing to Oust Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang
by ghtbircshotbe on Wednesday November 11, 2026 @06:33PM
(#50460521)
I'm thinking the people behind trying to oust him are people who don't appreciate him likely knowingly violating export sanctions and putting the rest of the company and himself at risk of massive fines and criminal prosecution
Re:Nvidia Is Preparing to Oust Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang
by cedws on Wednesday November 11, 2026 @07:09PM
(#50460949)
I think it's worth even considering that if the allegations are true that the objective was to get Huang fired. Sure, he sold China chips, but they have their own homegrown chips now and the Chinese government have played a direct part in that.
Re:Nvidia Is Preparing to Oust Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang
by SaucyWrong on Wednesday November 11, 2026 @07:43PM
(#50461326)
There is no “they” in this. My read is the timing of all of this entirely down to the results of the midterm elections.
Over the next two years, Congress is going to haul in every tech CEO who licked Trump’s boots. I think Jensen tried to get in front of it and now journalists and institutional short sellers are digging up the dirt.
I even wonder whether some elements within the Chinese government has a hand in it -- not (only) the mistress part but the ousting part.