Re:Google SWE points 48 AI agents at NASA Lidar, finds unmap...
by qlte on Wednesday November 11, 2026 @12:15PM
(#50455844)
Weird to turn this into a left/right "thing" based on flimsy assumptions after an election that demonstrated opposition to AI cuts across the political spectrum despite what e/acc types in a bubble on X might believe.
Re:Google SWE points 48 AI agents at NASA Lidar, finds unmap...
by whimsicalism on Wednesday November 11, 2026 @12:22PM
(#50455931)
I'm on the left and I am not an accelerationist. I think the intellectual property theft justification is a bad one for opposing AI and a surprising one to hear from corners of the internet I inhabit. All of my objections would apply equally to an AI trained from permissibly licensed material.
Re:Google SWE points 48 AI agents at NASA Lidar, finds unmap...
by parineum on Wednesday November 11, 2026 @12:26PM
(#50455966)
> the self-described 'left' is not going to convince me that corporate IP & knowledge restriction is actually a good thing
It just goes to show how fluid people's beliefs can be when they have identified a "bad guy". Everything they do is wrong, even when it aligns with their ethos.
Re:Google SWE points 48 AI agents at NASA Lidar, finds unmap...
by mlcrypto on Wednesday November 11, 2026 @12:34PM
(#50456056)
The so called progressives have actually been the ones opposed to progress throughout history. If they had their way we would all be frozen in time, entitled to our 1960s education & career
Re:Google SWE points 48 AI agents at NASA Lidar, finds unmap...
by georgemcbay on Wednesday November 11, 2026 @12:37PM
(#50456089)
> not going to convince me that corporate IP & knowledge restriction is actually a good thing and elsevier are the good guys.
multiple parties can be opposed to each other's goals with all of them still being the "bad guys".
> exponentially increasing the cost of hosting
We're on a technical forum, everyone knows the cost of hosting plaintext and what an exponential is.