I suspect open source projects are better off than proprietary software - they already have many eyes on them, whereas commercial software that’s not a prominent and profitable target (e.g. windows, ios) hasn’t had much attention until LLMs made attacking them significantly easier
Worse is everyone is like "Well, this stuff is protected or air gaped". Yea, it's behind firewall, or even private networks commonly, but the moment you get inside that network you have tons of lateral movement and could cause unbelievable damage in minutes.
> Not maintained or developed by a billion dollar company.
Directly? No. Indirectly? Yes. They are mostly funded by billion dollar companies.Afaik everyone working on curl has a day job.
This has been disproven by the sordid history of OpenSSL. It was open source, critical, and full of holes.
https://www.mend.io/blog/how-the-heartbleed-vulnerability-sh...
https://www.controleng.com/throwback-attack-hackers-attempt-...
https://esemag.com/water/russian-hackers-breached-quebec-wat...
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/us-water-systems-cyberattacks-i...
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-55989843
edit: formatting urls
Reminder that Stuxnet managed to jump an air gap (via USB keys):
Im still not worried about it. There's thousands of water treatment facilities in the USA and you've surfaced two occasions.
Ya'll should try actually breaking into something semi secure with an LLM, its not as easy as you might think. Seriously go try it, if you think its so easy there's millions of dollars to pick up off the floor on bugcrowd or h1. Seriously, please go give it a go.
Secondly, maybe the USA should stop committing mass murder across the globe if we don't want to be the subject of retaliatory attacks.
I would argue that systems were largely more vulnerable 5 years ago than they are now. Esepcially at a municiple level.
There seems to be a lot of "strategy of tension" being employed in these news cycles surrounding security and AI. Dont fall for it. You're fine. Systems are more secure now than they ever have been in the past.
But on the Israel note, thats awesome I hope more of that comes their way.
Airgaps don't solve everything either. Stuxnet was successful at destroying air-gapped machines.
Agreed. My fairly obscure company got hit by something like this last weekend. What stood out was the speed of the loop: it found something small, used it to uncover something else, and pivoted to clever exploits for the new thing within minutes. It hit a dozen of our apps in parallel across within the span of a day, from a rotating pool of residential proxies, Tor, GCP and Cloudflare IPs.
I'm fairly confident it was LLM-driven. The payloads and throwaway accounts had names like "PT59553 TEST IGNORE" and "PocCorp1659r2", and it adapted to error messages the way a person reading them would, just never sleeping. A non-tech company with 1000x the surface area and less monitoring could be in big trouble.
Of course I used LLMs for the defense too, and they were amazing at log forensics and fixes. The annoying part: when I asked Opus 5.5 for clear repro cases of exactly what the attackers did, I hit the cyber safeguards. It felt like Opus was intentionally trying to keep the exact exploits for my own bespoke applications away from me, though it was happy to point out how to fix it.
billion dollar companies are not exempt from this, in fact they tend to be the worst offenders