News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Crypto foundation demanded employees endorse suicide pledge by bityard on Monday November 09, 2026 @03:26PM (#50431518)
I have never been called for jury duty, but I doubt I would ever be chosen to sit on a jury. Despite the intent of the process, the lawyers on both sides are usually looking for jurors who are likely to be swayed by passionate arguments, not ones who will try very hard to make a logical decision based on whatever evidence is presented.
Re:Crypto foundation demanded employees endorse suicide pledge by nostrademons on Monday November 09, 2026 @04:25PM (#50432402)
I thought the same and even told my boss "Oh, I really doubt I'll get selected", but then not only was I selected out of the first round (despite going through like 80 people in the 120-person jury pool), I ended up as foreman.

They're selecting for neutrality. What both lawyers and the judge all want to see is someone who doesn't have an opinion on the case before it begins. That neutrality could be a product of them being easily swayed by arguments, or it could be someone who is coldly logical and makes a decision purely based on the evidence presented.

I watched about 65 people get dismissed, and what they all had in common was they were visibly emotional before the trial had even begun. That is what gets you dismissed. Meanwhile, about half the folks in the jury box didn't even realize that the fact that we were still sitting in the jury box meant we would probably be serving on the jury, we were still like "Oh, I'm probably going to get dismissed because I'm X kind of person and the lawyers aren't going to want X kind of person." If you can think of it that dispassionately, you are the type of person the lawyers want.

Re:Crypto foundation demanded employees endorse suicide pledge by ilamont on Monday November 09, 2026 @05:14PM (#50433033)
The judge picked our foreman very quickly. He just came into the room after we had been selected, looked at the person, asked if she wanted to be foreman, and that was it.

The person was the oldest or second oldest in the room. I don't think that was a coincidence.

Re:Crypto foundation demanded employees endorse suicide pledge by nostrademons on Monday November 09, 2026 @05:22PM (#50433121)
I was elected by the other jurors, and I have no idea why. Probably because I was willing to do it if nobody else wanted to, and nobody else wanted to.

(I was definitely not the oldest in the room - I think I was like the 2nd or 3rd youngest.)

Re:Crypto foundation demanded employees endorse suicide pledge by bombcar on Monday November 09, 2026 @09:50PM (#50435483)
I was elected to be the foreman because I went to the bathroom at the wrong (right?) time.
Re:Crypto foundation demanded employees endorse suicide pledge by reaperducer on Monday November 09, 2026 @06:49PM (#50434082)
The judge picked our foreman very quickly.

May I ask in which state?

In every state I've been on a jury, the foreman was chosen by the other jurors.

The person was the oldest or second oldest in the room. I don't think that was a coincidence.

This was never the case in any of the juries I was on.

Re:Crypto foundation demanded employees endorse suicide pledge by ilamont on Monday November 09, 2026 @08:44PM (#50435035)
Massachusetts.
Re:Crypto foundation demanded employees endorse suicide pledge by theultdev on Monday November 09, 2026 @09:57PM (#50435531)
Seems it's 1 of the 3 states where that happens.

MA is the outlier a lot of the times when it comes to court law it seems.

Re:Crypto foundation demanded employees endorse suicide pledge by themadturk on Tuesday November 10, 2026 @09:16PM (#50449046)
There were only a couple of things that stood out to me during voir dire: after they told us it was a murder case (murder is no longer a capital crime in my state), they asked every juror if they would have problems judging a case based only on circumstantial evidence (there was no video evidence and there were no witnesses), and if anyone would be prejudiced if the defendant never took the stand. I'm sure all the usual questions about neutrality, etc. were presented, I just don't remember them.

It's hard to believe there are still people who think having a witness take the stand in their own defense is a good thing. The only trial I've been in where that happened, the witness did what every defense attorney fears: he made things worse for himself than they were before (and things were pretty bad: it took us less than half an hour to convict).

Re:Crypto foundation demanded employees endorse suicide pledge by reaperducer on Monday November 09, 2026 @06:48PM (#50434058)
the lawyers on both sides are usually looking for jurors who are likely to be swayed by passionate arguments

How do you know this, when in the previous sentence you admitted:

I have never been called for jury duty

I've been on juries three times so far. The lawyers absolutely did not filter for people who could likely be swayed.

Or perhaps you confused "people who are likely to be swayed" with "people who have an open mind."