News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Too many men suffering in silence, national health report... by rubicon33 on Monday November 09, 2026 @02:31PM (#50430535)
You don't even have to sign a contract to end up in this situation. In California at least, just habituating with someone for 10 years is enough for the courts to consider you effectively married. That needs to be fixed. Marriage should absolutely be a contractual agreement where one party is fully aware what they're giving up, signing over, or potentially losing, not something you end up in through no fault of your own.
Re:Too many men suffering in silence, national health report... by soperj on Monday November 09, 2026 @02:33PM (#50430596)
In BC it's 6 months.
Re:Too many men suffering in silence, national health report... by jjice on Monday November 09, 2026 @02:38PM (#50430700)
Really? Looks like two years from their site.

https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/life-events/divorce/famil...

Re:Too many men suffering in silence, national health report... by soperj on Monday November 09, 2026 @03:04PM (#50431139)
it's 6 months to be common law in terms of employer benefits.
Re:Too many men suffering in silence, national health report... by colejhudson on Monday November 09, 2026 @02:45PM (#50430819)
Unless something has changed recently, I’m fairly certain California doesn’t recognize common-law marriages.
Re:Too many men suffering in silence, national health report... by dillondoyle on Monday November 09, 2026 @02:46PM (#50430836)
this "just habituating with someone for 10 years is enough for the courts to consider you effectively married" is completely false and a myth. Especially in California.

Only a few states have something like the common-law 'marriage' you picture - but it's a really high bar.

There needs to consideration AND usually clear intent to marry (w/ nuance of course);

You can't simply fall into this by happenstance because you cohabitate for {n} amount of years.

California does have a (ever barrowing) Marvin Action.

But it's an incredibly high bar and not family court

You need to prove that essentially a contract exists between the parties; * e.g. consideration *

https://www.wgslawfirm.com/family-law/divorce-mediation/2025...

Re:Too many men suffering in silence, national health report... by OkayPhysicist on Monday November 09, 2026 @02:58PM (#50431048)
You need to really fuck up to end up common-law married. You are simply wrong about California (we don't do common law marriage at all), and in all jurisdictions I'm aware of that do have common law marriages, you need to present yourself as married in order for there to be any claim.

That's not some "oh, we live together, and under old-timey understandings that means we're married" requirement. That's publicly making a pattern of referring to each other as your spouses, often including at least some public documentation. Common law marriage is much more about protecting people who failed to dot their 'i's and cross their 't's when registering their marriage than it is about surprising a breakup partner with divorce precedings.

Re:Too many men suffering in silence, national health report... by rubicon33 on Monday November 09, 2026 @03:06PM (#50431167)
Hm, this flies in stark contrast to what I've been told and what I believed, but you're right as far as I can tell, common law marriage does not apply if you simply live with someone for a long time.

For the record I had heard this from a lawyer, not some random person.

Re:Too many men suffering in silence, national health report... by wahern on Monday November 09, 2026 @03:09PM (#50431209)
Depending on the state, you don't need to refer to each other as a spouse, just that people get the impression you're spouses.

My father's last "marriage" was like this. After several divorces he was dead set on never getting married again, made sure only his (or her) name was on any purchases, and made sure his friends knew the situation. After a messy breakup where he discovered she had been diverting money for drugs and hiding bills, her lawyer managed to convince an Alabama court to find a common law marriage. Not long after she ended going to prison for arson after setting aflame some of my father personal and real property in piques of spite. I think those felony convictions happened prior to or at least concurrent with the common law marriage proceedings.

Re:Too many men suffering in silence, national health report... by skissane on Monday November 09, 2026 @04:03PM (#50432087)
> EDIT: Turns out this is NOT true, or at least, nothing I can find seems to point to it being true. Just habituating with someone for a long time is not enough.

It isn't true in California, it appears. It is true in a number of other places worldwide, Australia in particular.

Even in Australia, a de facto relationship – in which partners have a right to a property settlement upon separation – requires more than mere cohabitation of sexual/romantic partners. However, in practice, relatively few long-term cohabitating partners will be found not to be in a de facto relationship.