News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Claude Fable 5.2 and Mythos 5.2. Parent comment

Re:Claude Fable 5.2 and Mythos 5.2 by privacyishuman on Monday November 09, 2026 @02:15PM (#50430247)
They still need a response to Opus 5.5
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Claude Fable 5.2 and Mythos 5.2 by alasano on Monday November 09, 2026 @02:22PM (#50430356)
It's really true.

I think frontier models feel terrible after a new model requires you to do less babysitting, it's just really hard to go back once you've had to handhold less.

The only way I use Astra and 6.1 Sol now is if they're being orchestrated by Opus 5.5 so I don't have to talk to them directly.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Claude Fable 5.2 and Mythos 5.2 by sunaookami on Monday November 09, 2026 @02:32PM (#50430559)
GPT-6.1-Sol is so incredibly sloppy and dumb, it's embarassing.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Claude Fable 5.2 and Mythos 5.2 by LeBit on Monday November 09, 2026 @02:42PM (#50430773)
Maybe because it is so cheap.

They want to condition you to equal cheap with bad

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Claude Fable 5.2 and Mythos 5.2 by nsingh2 on Monday November 09, 2026 @02:50PM (#50430904)
It seems like OAI, with the GPT-6 models, focused a lot more on computer use, math, and maybe spatial/visual intelligence, more so that code. Compared to Ant. that seem to focus on code much more.

Reminds me of GPT-5, smart but wrote crap code, until they improved the code training with 5.3 and 5.4.

[ Parent | on HN ]