> Does it have literally anything to do with business?

Yes. The cheating is only a small part of it, although it does confirm he's a piece of trash and thereby throws into question his capability as a leader. More seriously, he potentially colluded with this person, an agent of a foreign government, to bypass export restrictions.

He is no leader of the free men. He is the CEO of a company that wants to make as much money as possible.

Honestly I don't even care about the restrictions, not my law.

Yes, and as the CEO of the company he did something really stupid that exposed that company to massive regulatory risk. And in so doing showed his entire ass. You don't have to care about the morality or legality of it to see that his fuckup has put the company in jeopardy. It was his only job to do literally the opposite of that. This incident means he's incompetent.

Yes exactly this. Also don't forget the mechanics of the deal for the export-capable chips for China, that last I read they had way under-delivered on so far, so that's a sensitive and potentially major issue.

It could still be an issue if his wife divorces him, takes a significant portion of his stock and decides to sell it off. The NVIDIA board would have to consider that possibility.

Are we talking about what is optimal for NVDA shareholders or what a genuine demonstration of "taking responsibility" might look like?