I've mentored a lot of young engineers and something I often point out is that there is practically zero risk in accepting an offer. Many companies also do not even present the full paperwork to sign until your first day or two.

You don't have to show up on the start date, though you do have to be mindful of the bridge you may be burning. But it is totally reasonable to show up to a few days of work, and declare "you know what, I don't think this is a good fit" and no one will be offended. They don't have to know that you already accepted another offer.

Exploding offers, low-ball offers, all bullshit. But you don't have to play their games.

This is certainly valid in "right to work" states like Pennsylvania. If there is no notice period, then there is no penalty from accepting multiple jobs. Having accepted a job, there are also various ways to push the start date forward.

Some corporations will exploit whatever advantages they perceive. I overheard one hiring manager refer to their process as "the hunger games".

Another benefit: if people start doing this often, companies might start using actual notice periods that apply to both sides.

[delayed]

bingo. hiring is expensive, onboarding is expensive, offboarding is annoying and has non-trivial-risk, and dragging it out means work isn't get done in that position.

unless you're looking at VP and up level roles where there may be a significant delta in risk, cost, and pay it's probably not worth it.

And if you’re hiring a VP who isn’t able to see through the tactic… do you even want that?