News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Sshole. Parent comment

Re:Sshole by phyzome on Thursday November 05, 2026 @02:36PM (#50383399)
It's definitely an AI slop website even if a human wrote the text. I found it pretty hard to get through the garbage animations.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Sshole by epestr on Thursday November 05, 2026 @04:23PM (#50384635)
I don't think a human wrote the text either, it's likely edited after generation: https://paste.c-net.org/ExtortSincere.

> mostly the boring parts where it talks to libc, like the password code

Is clearly not human.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Sshole by phyzome on Thursday November 05, 2026 @06:52PM (#50386281)
I don't trust Pangram, but the writing is a bit weird.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Sshole by ShinyLeftPad on Thursday November 05, 2026 @08:09PM (#50386894)
Pangram false positives
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Sshole by hk__2 on Saturday November 07, 2026 @04:25PM (#50408204)
> 100% of this text is possibly AI

What a weird wording. Pretty much 100% of any text is *possibly* AI.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Sshole by efilife on Thursday November 05, 2026 @11:12PM (#50388087)
It's just a LLM instructed to write everything lowercase. Fooled you
[ Parent | on HN ]